WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.5K

I understand the importance of law and order but when the cops are upholding clearly unconstitutional “mandates”, we end up in a situation where we either lose everything to the JWO, or we choose to see the cops for what they are, enemies of the people, until they see us as more important than their government paycheck and finally say “hey wait, we are on your side” .

I understand the importance of law and order but when the cops are upholding clearly unconstitutional “mandates”, we end up in a situation where we either lose everything to the JWO, or we choose to see the cops for what they are, enemies of the people, until they see us as more important than their government paycheck and finally say “hey wait, we are on your side” .

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

That's too broad a viewpoint, cops in deep blue cities behave differently than the cops in red areas. If the cops in deep blue cities are fucking up the leftists who live there because of masks then that's on them. They are getting the tyranny they chose when they elected their local politicians. In the other parts of the country the cops aren't being so tyrannical about it.

I don't think cops behave any differently anywhere, they all just Institute whatever tyranny is asked of them

[–] 1 pt

Pretty evident that’s exactly how they behave considering how many states showed compliant cops when the red flag laws were passed in those states. They do what they’re told, their checks and pension depend on it.

[–] 0 pt

The point was that they do what their bosses tell them, they're not autonomous agents of law enforcement.

[–] 0 pt

The big thing is, the word tyranny has been watered down. People don't really recognize tyranny when they see it any more. You hear the word and it sounds like nothing, like hyperbole, like a guy being dragged off a flight because hes screaming about gremlins on the wing of the plane. But tyranny is real.

I think it is one of those words thats become a non-word: an abstraction, losing its concreteness by the remoteness of its meaning from everyday life, or more likely, losing its meaning to normalcy bias.

A slave does not comprehend tyranny, because a slave has never known freedom.