Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

931

One fundamental problem with the way in which people think is that they still view the world through the leftist framework in which morality is determined by consent and freedom, not a deeper, morality that can't be explained in such buzzwords.

Another problem is that they still use leftist buzzwords, like "wasism," when there is nothing wrong with racial prejudice and "wasism" presupposes there being something wrong with it (prejudice, not abusing other good race's of man). Another thing they misunderstand is that evil should never be tolerated, niggers (all "black" "people" /negroids are niggers) are evil not only (and not the source) because of their actions or because of their "culture" but because of the way in which they think, their racial collective unconscious (as extremely undeveloped and animalistic as it is) is evil, and thus niggers should be exterminated, while, for instance, not all East Asians should be (as they're not all evil and have a highly developed, albeit different, racial collective unconscious from us).

Another serious problem is that people in our movement (and White people in general) have been programmed to "put themselves" in the shoes of others outside of their race (which is impossible because you cannot view your own people as alien) which has led to people not having any real understanding of how non-Whites actually think or how the world really works. You can only understand an issue properly if you put yourself in a situation that you can understand. If you want to understand slavery for example, you cannot view it from a niggers perspective, but must craft a story in which Whites are enslaved by non-Whites (my go to is East Asians, as they are the most similar to Whites) and try and understand how you would react and feel in those circumstances and then imagine how you would react. Would you want to rape, cuck, murder and loot all the East Asians for having enslaved your ancestors hundreds of years ago? Would you want to be given unfair advantages over them for something their ancestors did? Would our people have even ever pushed for desegregation and race-mixing? If we had rebelled against them, would you have gone on to rape (no one deserves to be raped, period) and kill innocent (one can only control their own actions, no one is responsible for the actions of others) East Asian girls/women and children? Or would you have just killed those that raped and abused your people?

One fundamental problem with the way in which people think is that they still view the world through the leftist framework in which morality is determined by consent and freedom, not a deeper, morality that can't be explained in such buzzwords. Another problem is that they still use leftist buzzwords, like "wasism," when there is nothing wrong with racial prejudice and "wasism" presupposes there being something wrong with it (prejudice, not abusing other good race's of man). Another thing they misunderstand is that evil should never be tolerated, niggers (all "black" "people" /negroids are niggers) are evil not only (and not the source) because of their actions or because of their "culture" but because of the way in which they think, their racial collective unconscious (as extremely undeveloped and animalistic as it is) is evil, and thus niggers should be exterminated, while, for instance, not all East Asians should be (as they're not all evil and have a highly developed, albeit different, racial collective unconscious from us). Another serious problem is that people in our movement (and White people in general) have been programmed to "put themselves" in the shoes of others outside of their race (which is impossible because you cannot view your own people as alien) which has led to people not having any real understanding of how non-Whites actually think or how the world really works. You can only understand an issue properly if you put yourself in a situation that you can understand. If you want to understand slavery for example, you cannot view it from a niggers perspective, but must craft a story in which Whites are enslaved by non-Whites (my go to is East Asians, as they are the most similar to Whites) and try and understand how you would react and feel in those circumstances and then imagine how you would react. Would you want to rape, cuck, murder and loot all the East Asians for having enslaved your ancestors hundreds of years ago? Would you want to be given unfair advantages over them for something their ancestors did? Would our people have even ever pushed for desegregation and race-mixing? If we had rebelled against them, would you have gone on to rape (no one deserves to be raped, period) and kill innocent (one can only control their own actions, no one is responsible for the actions of others) East Asian girls/women and children? Or would you have just killed those that raped and abused your people?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (21).
[–] • 0 pt

I'm just repeating what I've already said.

I know all bout genetic IQ, frontal lobe size differences, all of that. The more of that sort of stuff I know, the better I can relate what they are to what I am

I can use what information I know about them to more accurately form a picture of what they are. They are me + this attribute, - this attribute, extrapolated.

At this point you're basically just saying "nu-uh your wrong because reasons"

[–] • 0 pt

Also, to assume that they "think we do except for them being dumber and more violent than us is no more grounded in "facts" than my view is, the issue with your view however is that it isn't logical to assume they think like we do at a fundamental level anymore than it is logical to assume that they are just as smart as us. Your issue is that you are an egalitarian when it comes to "how people think." Smart niggers do not think like smart Whites anymore than smart Asians do, few people ever makes the argument that smart Asians and smart Whites think the same because we know they don't, it's only with niggers (all blacks are niggers), who you have been conditioned to empathize with that you do this too and it's cucked.

[–] • 0 pt

I'm not sure how you're getting that I'm egalitarian out of anything that I'm saying. I'm for equal opportunity rather than equal outcome like diversity is.

But anyways

What I am saying is that niggers and animals do not think like us anymore than a bee and ant does.

Smart niggers do not think like smart Whites anymore than smart Asians do, few people ever makes the argument that smart Asians and smart Whites think the same because we know they don't, it's only with niggers

So what, you're saying the way living things act is some big mystery you cannot possibly have any opinion on? Is that right? You cannot possibly predict how people act?

[–] • 0 pt

No, what I am saying is that to predict and understand how people think you cannot "put yourself in their shoes" because you cannot and do not think like them, just like you cannot put yourself in a bees shoes to understand how it thinks you cannot understand how a nigger thinks by putting your shoes in it's head (although you should totally curbstomp niggers), you have to observe how they behave and how they think to understand how they think. They are psychotic, evil animals that want to cuck, rape, murder and destroy everything that isn't a nigger (and other niggers too), that is the driving force in their lives, that and to gain status to improve their personal standing, everything niggers do is about themselves and the only thing they care about, cry about and everything they do is self-centered in nature and by "putting yourself in their shoes" you are humanizing what is in essence inhuman and is why our race is dead, White people love and care about niggers because they think that niggers are basically Whites when they are not.

[–] • 0 pt

I'm saying I disagree with you because I don't think they, at a fundamental level think like us at all, I don't even think they really think at all, I think they run entirely off of a primitive "instinct" that drives their every action. I could go more into why I believe the things i do about them but it, like all psychology that isn't "hard science" (most of psychology) is not something I can uses statistics to back up.

[–] • 0 pt

I would agree with you that, in general, they are basically more primitive humans. But like I said before, you can even empathize with animals. Just because you empathize with them, just because you understand them, does not mean you let them run wild.

Maybe a better analogy is children. You can empathize with children. You were one once. You know why children throw fits and cry over stupid things. Children get frustrated that it has to share, they can't hit its siblings, they are impatient etc. You can understand that because you have been impatient, you have your own things that you don't want to share, sometimes you want to hit people in order to get your way. You understand that the child does not fully understand what its doing. But just because you empathize with that frustration does not mean you allow it to hit its siblings or steal the toys. The child does not learn any good lessons from being allowed its terrible behavior.

What you're describing, is that society, in general lets the child run wild.

[–] • 0 pt

"just because you understand them" What I am trying to say is that you cannot truly understand them if you empathize with them because they do not think, at a fundamental level, like you do, so trying to think "how would I act in their situation" does not work regardless of the factors you take into account. What I am saying is that niggers and animals do not think like us anymore than a bee and ant does.