See, I don't think that will be the case. I think as we build said machines— we'll become said machines: self-improvement— the definition of evolution. We'll replace our lower-selves, over time, with a much more evolved version. But it won't be an eradication: it'll be a transformation.
See, I don't think that will be the case. I think as we build said machines— we'll *become* said machines: self-improvement— the definition of evolution. We'll replace our lower-selves, over time, with a much more evolved version. But it won't be an eradication: it'll be a transformation.
If we become the Machines, we still eliminate Humanity.
If we become the Machines, we still eliminate Humanity.
Not really. We redefine humanity, not eliminate it. Would you consider the change from us being single-celled organisms to what we are today an act of eradication?
Not really. We redefine humanity, not eliminate it. Would you consider the change from us being single-celled organisms to what we are today an act of eradication?
I don't believe these are analogous. Single cells are still required for the multi-cellular organism composition.
The Machine can (and I argue will) shed all biology. The biological will, inevitably, become unnecessary.
I don't believe these are analogous. Single cells are still required for the multi-cellular organism composition.
The Machine can (and I argue will) shed all biology. The biological will, inevitably, become unnecessary.
(post is archived)