Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

600

She is telling me how women before slavery were content in the household and their role in society in general. Then the blacks where freed and given eventually equal treatment under the eyes of the law and white women were outraged that lowly niggers where given more equality than them. Its a great observation.

She is telling me how women before slavery were content in the household and their role in society in general. Then the blacks where freed and given eventually equal treatment under the eyes of the law and white women were outraged that lowly niggers where given more equality than them. Its a great observation.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (26).
[–] • 1 pt

They didn't have the right to vote and mud races gaining legal status while they were denied that right would piss a woman off.

[–] • 2 pts

That may be true, but hasn't got a damned thing to do with the subject as written. The feminist movement predated the end of slavery by something like 20 years.

Your female roommate should read a damned history book before making bold proclamations.

Alternatively, you could sanity check her statements before posting them online as though they're grand revelations. That's entirely up to you, of course.

[–] • 1 pt

You are implying every woman in America was behind the movement 20 years before this. Her argument is that this really got them motivated seeing former property have rights they didn't. But because she is technically wrong there must be no merit in her argument right?

[–] • 1 pt

That doesn't even make sense. She's not technically wrong, she's just wrong.

That is, her statement is incorrect. There's nothing technical about it. It's just plain wrong.

If she'd like to move the goal posts and present a different argument, that's fine. But, this one is just wrong.