Because the FBI was spying from the air, that makes us automatically assume that guy was a state sponsored asset?
What does one necessarily have to do with the other?
Read it again. The poster knew the fbi was spying. That's impossible unless he is at least legit. Whether he is telling the truth is another matter. Hence "good reason to believe..."
I don’t need to read it again. I get it.
The point of my question remains the same.
So because he knew of the footage before it was made public otherwise, then he has credibility. Thus everything else he says is true.
No, I get it. It doesn’t prove anything, however. It is interesting nonetheless and I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s true.
All I’m saying is that this isn’t enough to tell my blue/black pilled friends/family “that guy totally worked for Mossad.”
Where did I say proof. You're acting like a kike faggot
(post is archived)