These are all the result if socialist policies. Incorporation is socialist. It's socialist for people to not be held legally accountable for their actions, due to being able to hide behind some abstract corporate legal body. It's socialist for a business to be forced to look after the interests of their shareholders rather than possessing the freedom of enterprise. Monopolies and oligopolies are the product of socialist policies. Where a business is preferred over others by the government, where taxpayer funds are given to said businesses where they should have the free market ad their sole source of income, where governments introduce taxes and regulations and laws that strangle the competitors of these businesses but allow them the freedom to evade them. It's socialist to recognize the ownership of nonphysical properties, from which these corporations draw the majority of their profits. I can go on a lot more (such as talking about banking, and the parts covered by the globalistic policies that I oppose, such as open borders, foreign trade, and foreign labor), but what I've put is sufficient, and I'm worried about character limits. These corporations would not exist with the socialist and globalist parts of our economy and country, it has little to do with capitalism, which had benefitted us for many years. Also, full disclosure, I'm not American, but speaking as if I were, I think it would only be honest to mention this, but it should not detract too much from my point.