"doesn't violate our community standards"
BULLSHIT
it's straight up incitement to criminal activity, the use of language which implies condoning the perpetration of a crime is typically treated as just as good as a clear call for something under facebook's own community standards.
It's affiliated with at least two known organizations that promote criminal activities and have a history of protecting, aiding, and abetting criminals, which goes against the community standards of facebook.
It's unsuited for public viewing, when it shows a picture of a man and a girl holding hands, that's okay, they could jut be father and daughter or something like that, but the added context of messages regarding sexual attractions of adults to children changes the way the photo is interpreted, and turns it into something that is intended to make you think that he and the little girl are going off to fuck, this implication of unacceptable sexual content is just as good as the direct portrayal of the same, according to the community standards..
Just from the precedent of how facebook has treated far less objectionable groups, like the proud boys, makes it clear that of the rules were to be enforced consistently, this post would be removed, and the poster issued some form of penalty.
(post is archived)