It's "natural" to want to impose yourself on babies because you were molested but it's not "natural" to want a white wife to have white children.... I'm starting to get in the mood for boog.

They’ve been pushing and pushing and pushing their propaganda for decades now. Today’s children are being force-fed poison on trannies and homosexuals. They’re being told they’re competent enough to consent to gender reassignment surgery as young as 4.

I’m confident that our current society, as rotten as it is, will hold out a little longer, but when today’s kids become voting-aged adults in 15 years, will their minds be warped enough to finally accept this?

What sort of hellscape awaits us in the coming decades?

Serial killers are a natural orientation that some people have towards life.

It is our responsibility to redirect and to overcome our negative feelings about serial killers.

It’s been cumming for a long time.

So breaking the law is natural and fine now? Oh.. yeah.. a pedophile and a cocksucking whore are president and vice president. Without even being elected. Adds up.

Looks fake as shit. Funny though.

"doesn't violate our community standards"

BULLSHIT

1. it's straight up incitement to criminal activity, the use of language which implies condoning the perpetration of a crime is typically treated as just as good as a clear call for something under facebook's own community standards.

2. It's affiliated with at least two known organizations that promote criminal activities and have a history of protecting, aiding, and abetting criminals, which goes against the community standards of facebook.

3. It's unsuited for public viewing, when it shows a picture of a man and a girl holding hands, that's okay, they could jut be father and daughter or something like that, but the added context of messages regarding sexual attractions of adults to children changes the way the photo is interpreted, and turns it into something that is intended to make you think that he and the little girl are going off to fuck, this implication of unacceptable sexual content is just as good as the direct portrayal of the same, according to the community standards..

4. Just from the precedent of how facebook has treated far less objectionable groups, like the proud boys, makes it clear that of the rules were to be enforced consistently, this post would be removed, and the poster issued some form of penalty.

Is there a link to the actual page?