Socialism/liberalism is all about victimhood. Under socialism you are either a victim or you are the cause of an injustice that results in victims and therefore must be targeted and taken down. Socialism was expressly created to protect victims. As a result it needs to have victims to function; no victims means no socialism. If this isn't an argument for why there will never be a perfect socialist state then I don't know what is. If you're a victim then by definition you can not be happy, therefore socialism equals misery. It's interesting to note here that perfect socialism would be perfect misery. Socialism is also endlessly divisive. Even within a repressed group there will be some that, relative to the rest of the group, are considered to be less repressed and therefore are privileged and thereby become the target. We see this today when minorities feminists speak out against white feminists. Pretty soon fighting amongst the minorities feminists will begin over who is the more repressed. This is the basis for *intersectionality*. The 20th century is full of examples of abject misery thanks to socialism. But if you need concrete proof then you need go no further than the 120 million dead all at the hand of socialism.