WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

565
[–] 1 pt

I'd agree for some types of weather, but hurricanes are kinda hard to fake.

The hurricane is real. They don't have to fake that. The devastation is what they will fake. I don't think the storm is as powerful in such a short period of time, especially after a lot of energy was pulled out of the water by Helene. I think they will amplify the destruction just like they manufacture fake ballots. It's a psychological attack based on a real disaster. I think it's been done before and will be done again until we are ready to give up our freedom for the empty promises of (((safety))).

but I'd be inclined to believe that space lasers are heating the ocean, more than I'd believe that helicopters are wind washing an area larger than some European countries

How much energy would we have to have powering space lasers to heat the ocean like this? We don't have the ability to generate much less put into orbit the levels of energy needed to do this. Also, lasers don't work that way. You've watched too many science fiction movies. You don't need to use helicopters across the entire area of the storm. You just concentrate the damage to key areas that were already damaged by the real storm. You amplify the destruction not cause it in its entirety. You then show the amplified destruction on the jewbox and everyone believes it. Show that same damage on repeat 24x7 for weeks and people will extrapolate that damage to the entire storm affected area. You only have to get the people to accept what they are shown. The people will fill in the rest for themselves.

[–] 1 pt

Do you think the Maui fires were natural?

[–] 1 pt

Do you think the Maui fires were natural?

No, they weren't natural. And no, they weren't caused by space lasers either. That's the conspiracy theory spread around to make skeptics sound like nut jobs. No need for space lasers when good old arson works better, faster and cheaper.

Did space lasers bring down the towers in NYC?

[–] 1 pt

No, those were controlled detonation.

I've seen photos out of CA, Canada, and Maui that appear to be concentrated light bursts, prior to the fires, that look remarkably like an energy weapon. That's why my thoughts drift to that type of weapon

[–] 0 pt

Helene didn't pull as much energy out as they expected. The Gulf is still bathwater warm, but the problem is the depth at which it extends. All Helene did was pull the warmth up to the surface. However, that explains the storms in front/East of Milton. This doesn't explain the intensification that it went through off the northwest of the Yucatan Peninsula.

[–] 0 pt

>especially after a lot of energy was pulled out of the water by Helene.

You really have no fucking clue what you are talking about.

[–] 0 pt

You really have no fucking clue what you are talking about.

I notice you have nothing to say except to try to insult me. Can't you make a cogent argument as to why you think I don't know what I am talking about? Do you need me to define cogent for you?

[–] 0 pt

Whoa whoa whoa????? Exactly WHERE did I insult you???? I did not call you any names or disparage you in any way. I am simply saying that you have no fucking clue what you are talking about. And you DON'T. You just don't. Really, Tell me about you knowledge about hurricanes or meteorology in general??? Tell me?? All you have done so far is make a fool of yourself.