Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

Consider this: The earth orbits the sun once every 365 days. All the while our local climate changes throughout the seasons.

The sun orbits the galaxy once every ~230 million years (galactic year).

Our Galaxy is constantly expanding and, (possibly), orbiting something even larger than we can conceive.

Point is... The Earth is in a location in space that it has "never" been in before. It is constantly and always will be in a new area of space forever. To think the energy distribution throughout space is equal seems naive. So does thinking that our local/global climate will remain the same forever without "change".

Consider this: The earth orbits the sun once every 365 days. All the while our local climate changes throughout the seasons. The sun orbits the galaxy once every ~230 million years (galactic year). Our Galaxy is constantly expanding and, (possibly), orbiting something even larger than we can conceive. Point is... The Earth is in a location in space that it has "never" been in before. It is constantly and always will be in a new area of space forever. To think the energy distribution throughout space is equal seems naive. So does thinking that our local/global climate will remain the same forever without "change".

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (11).
[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

Of course climate change is real. The evidence is in the ground layers.

Man-made climate change is dubious based on the carbon content of the atmosphere is pretty dubious.

Here's a wonderful comment I saved, by user @Gumbatron that explains things much better than I ever could.

[–] • 1 pt

An example of Atmospheric CO2 data parameterization is showing a chart that measures CO2 in ppm over time. But in the ppm column the min-max values are 0-450. If it was 0-1000000 it would be a straight line.

This is what most fraudulent CO2 charts look like https://pic8.co/sh/tPFrTY.jpg