WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

1.3K

Consider this: The earth orbits the sun once every 365 days. All the while our local climate changes throughout the seasons.

The sun orbits the galaxy once every ~230 million years (galactic year).

Our Galaxy is constantly expanding and, (possibly), orbiting something even larger than we can conceive.

Point is... The Earth is in a location in space that it has "never" been in before. It is constantly and always will be in a new area of space forever. To think the energy distribution throughout space is equal seems naive. So does thinking that our local/global climate will remain the same forever without "change".

Consider this: The earth orbits the sun once every 365 days. All the while our local climate changes throughout the seasons. The sun orbits the galaxy once every ~230 million years (galactic year). Our Galaxy is constantly expanding and, (possibly), orbiting something even larger than we can conceive. Point is... The Earth is in a location in space that it has "never" been in before. It is constantly and always will be in a new area of space forever. To think the energy distribution throughout space is equal seems naive. So does thinking that our local/global climate will remain the same forever without "change".

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

It's solar output. Interstellar weather is dwarfed by the effect of the sun.

[–] 2 pts

Hardly takes a genius to figure this out which makes me feel much less for my fellow men.

[–] 2 pts

All of Canada, New England, NY state, Alaska and Minnesota were once covered by a mile high glacier. If people were around, they would complain that global warming was melting the glaciers and changing the environment. They were right. It changed.

Of course climate change is real. The evidence is in the ground layers.

Man-made climate change is dubious based on the carbon content of the atmosphere is pretty dubious.

Here's a wonderful comment I saved, by user @Gumbatron that explains things much better than I ever could.

[–] 1 pt

An example of Atmospheric CO2 data parameterization is showing a chart that measures CO2 in ppm over time. But in the ppm column the min-max values are 0-450. If it was 0-1000000 it would be a straight line.

This is what most fraudulent CO2 charts look like https://pic8.co/sh/tPFrTY.jpg

[–] 0 pt

The science of climate change is irrelevant.

The only fact that matters is that climate change is a political movement. There is zero proof politicians can stagnate global climate. There is zero reason to believe that politicians would willingly end such a massive wealth and power grab by stagnanting climate change

[–] 0 pt

I'm sad how people never think of this.

It's almost like they forget the 4 seasons exist and are surprised when summer is hot and winter is cold.

[+] [deleted] -4 pt