I've never really understood this concept. It's well known law enforcement lies to anyone constantly w/ impunity. The people that demand this are retarded. of who is this 'of a use' to? Our iuntelligence agencies lied and spied on a presidential candidate.... But seriously do any of you fags think you're gonna print out this page like a form of protection? Monopoly has a get out of jail free too card as well.
You are stupid as fuck. It's 'evidence' by negation, which is legal. Versus evidence of the positive ( the thing happening) which is illegal in cases of sealed warrants etc. But you're a jew so I get why you try to call this legal protection into question.
oh lawdy, don't you need to get back to blocking me sugar tits. And the federal govt will still lie and let you think this protection is in place.. that's not considered entrapment tard...
I don't think you understood what this is saying. Or what it means.
It does not offer any type of protection and nor should you infer that.
This is more of an announcement, it is saying that Poal hasn't gotten any Law enforcement requests from any jurisdictions. This is posted occasionally and the last time it was posted a comment said that when warrants are served they often have a non disclosure demand. So for example: The FBLie serves Poal with a warrant for user KaliYuga's information and all his communications. Poal would be obligated to provide that information but they may be gag ordered to not divulge this information to you or others. The comment suggested that this may be a round about way of complying with the gag order but also letting folks know that something is amiss.
Wouldn't all the q anon is tulsi gabbard has nut cancer be more related to wat q sub here actually does? That's all bs. What i'm saying is that at the end of the day it's all trust.
Say what? What does that have to do with anything in the original post, your comment, my comment or the sub its posted in?
(post is archived)