>go away, and tell people how naked kid pics dont legally count as CP then.
Oh look, you're circling the wagons once again. Read my prior comments above more closely. Your smoke and mirrors won't work.
>>go away, and tell people how naked kid pics dont legally count as CP then.
Oh look, you're circling the wagons once again. Read my prior comments above more closely. Your smoke and mirrors won't work.
you dont want me circling back to this part of the story.
you posted text saying that according to legal definitions, certain things were and were not CP. somehow you thought Aged posting clothed pictures of kids with sexual intent, did not count as a red flag enough to ban him for.
you dont want me circling back to this part of the story.
you posted text saying that according to legal definitions, certain things were and were not CP. somehow you thought Aged posting clothed pictures of kids with sexual intent, did not count as a red flag enough to ban him for.
And now you're inventing new claims that were never a part of that comment chain.
And now you're inventing new claims that were never a part of that comment chain.
bullshit.
thats the thing that was happening when the argument happened, and thats what you said.
bullshit.
thats the thing that was happening when the argument happened, and thats what you said.
(post is archived)