Historically, slavs weren't considered whites in the anglo world for instance, nor were they considered aryan by nazis, it's a fact https://andscape.com/features/white-immigrants-werent-always-considered-white-and-acceptable/
>White immigrants weren’t always considered white — and acceptable Italians, Greeks, Poles, Hungarians, Slavs and other European groups had to overcome prejudice over many years
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_people
>The concept of a unified White race did not achieve universal acceptance in Europe when it first came into use in the 17th century, or in the centuries afterward. Nazi Germany regarded some European peoples such as Slavs
That being said, as far as I'm concerned, today, if you ask me "show me a white country" I would start looking at eastern europe, because that's where you can find the closest thing to a "white country" these days and that's a fact
Communism was bad, but it shielded eastern europe from neo liberalism and multiculti bs for a while, enough to prevent them from falling for that crap like the west did
And as a matter of fact I feel much closer to a slav than to any random diversity nigger
I know most of the evidence you have linked. I will point out that these are Anglo/Germanic opinions and considerations. I'm Czech and we were generally respected by the Germans as my grandmother explained when I asked her what she thought of WW2 and before and after. Hitler wanted to assimilate Czechs as we were in the Austro-Hungarian Empire. Hitler was angry at Slavs due to the Tannenberg or AKA Battle of Grunwald July 15, 1410. I read an interesting book about how they've pieced together how the battle went down. It was a major defeat for the Teutonic Knights. Here is a good quoted summary:
By 1400 the long running conflict between the Order of Teutonic Knights and Poland and Lithuania was coming to a head, partly as a result of the Order's meddling in the internal politics of its neighbours. In June 1410 King Wladislaw Jagiello of Poland invaded the Order's territory with a powerful allied army including all the enemies of the Teutonic Knights – Poles, Lithuanians, Russians, Bohemians, Hungarians, Tartars and Cossacks. This book recounts how, when the armies clashed on the wooded, rolling hills near the small village of Tannenberg, the Teutonic Knights suffered a disastrous defeat from which their Order never recovered.
So obviously Hitler knowing history view this as a major set back to his people and disliked Slavs for this.. We'd all be speaking Germany up to the border with Russia if Tuetonic Knights won. The fact is Slavs are 100% White. Lot's of A+ people White as can be skin, blue eyes, blonde and absolutely beautiful women. Ultra clean people. The main thing is our countries are still White unlike all the jewed out Germanic and Anglo countries and you're exactly right about communism and how it shielded us from what happened in the West. Also I'd like to point out that there is and always was something called central Europe. Not all Slavs are "Eastern European" Czechs for example are Central Europeans. Most of our country and capital is more west then Austria.
Yeah central europe is a thing that often gets overlooked in that east/west narrative, you're absolutely right
Thx for sharing the teutonic knights story slavbro, I wasn't aware of that
You're welcome and thanks as well.
nor were they considered aryan by nazis, it's a fact
Yeah ok that's why an SS building had this.
And?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Slavic_sentiment#Nazi_Germany
>Hitler’s autobiography Mein Kampf was openly anti-Slavic. He wrote: “One ought to cast the utmost doubt on the state-building power of the Slavs” and from the beginning, he rejected the idea of incorporating the Slavs into Greater Germany.[13] There were exceptions for some minorities in these states which were deemed by the Nazis to be the descendants of ethnic Germanic settlers, and not merely Slavs who were willing to be Germanized.[12] Hitler considered the Slavs to be racially inferior, because, in his view, the Bolshevik Revolution had put the Jews in power over the mass of Slavs, who were, by his own definition, incapable of ruling themselves but were instead being ruled by Jewish masters.[14] He considered the development of Modern Russia to have been the work of Germanic, not Slavic, elements in the nation, but believed those achievements had been undone and destroyed by the October Revolution,[15] in Mein Kampf, he wrote, “The organization of a Russian state formation was not the result of the political abilities of the Slavs in Russia, but only a wonderful example of the state-forming efficacity of the German element in an inferior race”.[16]
It's pretty clear that hitler didn't regard slavs as equals
And it's been confirmed by a czech here, in this very thread, so idk where you're going with that picture of yours
https://religion.fandom.com/wiki/Black_Sun_(symbol)#Historical_background
The design has loose visual parallels in Migration Age Alemannic brooches (Zierscheiben), possibly a variation of the Roman swastika fibula, thought to have been worn on Frankish and Alemannic women's belts.[1] Some Alemannic or Bavarian specimens incorporate a swastika symbol at the center.[2] The number of rays in the brooches varies between five and twelve.
Goodrick-Clarke (2002) does connect the Wewelsburg design with the Early Medieval Germanic brooches, and does assume that the original artifacts had a solar significance, stating that "this twelve-spoke sun wheel derives from decorative disks of the Merovingians of the early medieval period and are supposed to represent the visible sun or its passage through the months of the year."[3] He further refers to scholarly discussion of the brooches in Nazi Germany,[4] allowing for the possibility that the designers of the Wewelsburg mosaic were indeed inspired by these historical precedents.
(post is archived)