OK super smart guy... How do you propose it was done if not done with similar methods to what this man proposes and proved?
You are the only ignorant one here
That's a logically fallacy. Just because we know with 100% certainly none of the above did it, doesn't mean we know how it was done.
By accepting bullshit that the above did it, means mainstream research into how it was actually done becomes an impossibility. And the gatekeepers remain employed. And the masses remain ignorant.
Again you answer by not answering. You just pick a topic and talk shit with little to no experience yourself. Profoundly ignorant...
The lightest stones used in stonehenge, they come from 250km away... And their weight goes up to 4 tons...
I let you imagine what it's going to be to move them around with the little wooden rail under it, and in mud and shit, 4 to 5000 years ago... (because that's how old that thing is, it largely predates jesus christ... By some 3000 years or so...)
Now the heaviest ones, the so called "sarsens" are 9 meters tall and weight around 25 tons.... Good luck with that
I did directly answer. Just because you're low IQ doesn't mean you were not answered. Just because you dislike the facts, doesn't mean you were not answered.
Down voting because your comment is epic stupidity.
(post is archived)