When Sagan said this 25 years ago it was nothing exceptional. It is exactly how most moderately intelligent people thought. Questioning science was how science was done, everyone knew that. Only since covid has the stance changed to "Don't question the science!!", which is a bunch of horse shit.
And here we are 30 years later and now we know for a fact:
At LEAST 50% of all peer reviewed scientific papers cannot replicated.
You cannot trust scientists to tell the truth about anything because their field, just like every other field, is a political mine field.
At least in great part, THE VERY REASON that we are in the place we are today especially with the chyna virus is because of faggots like this jew spewed total bullshit about what science is and how scary it is to question science.
>faggots like this jew spewed total bullshit about what science is and how scary it is to question science.>>
I'm guessing that you didn't actually listen to what he said in the video
I did. What this video is about is NOT what it is presented as. It is presented as an us vs them or an us now vs them long ago. In other words, it is presented as a light vs dark, heaven vs hell dichotomy where if we slip from the grace of science we will forever be subject to the vagaries of the mythological mind of the simpleton that belives in magic, elves and healing herbs.
This is the surface level and it hides what is REALLY being said.
In order to understand what is actually being said is that you have to understand that Sagan is a jew and all jews are a separate human species that went through a genetic bottleneck some time ago resulting in their entire species being basically a kind of high functioning autistic human that has an EXTREMELY HIGH propensity for hyper focus on abstract symbolic representation, such as math, linguistics and law (law is just programming in human grammar). Combine that with a kind of propensity for messianic thought that is present in basically every jew that I have ever met (jews believe they are special and their propensity for seeing patterns the cattle around them don't see gives them an irresistable proof of their greatness) results in them truly believing that they are saviours of all humanity. They all truly belive this. It isn't analogous to white peoples mythologies where we like them and might accept them but not REALLY believe them. It is actually the inverse of that. All jews ACTUALLY believe they are special and they see proof of that everywhere, their mythology only supports that natural tendency.
Or, in other words, what Sagan is actually saying here is that he as a science communicator and a scientist he is bestowing on us, his cattle, secrets of the universe and knowledge of the light onto us so much so that we should be simultaneously grateful of his special access to the godly realms and fearful of losing access to his gifts because if he, the jew, were ever to stop his work we would all suffer.
Because we cannot be trusted to think for our selves, we cannot be trusted to inquire for our selves.
The reality of the situation is that science and scientists cannot be trusted any more than you can trust a car salesman or a plumber. Science is merely a process and all of us not only have access and capability to pursue it we have the skills and obligation to be perpetually skeptical.
which reminds me. are we allowed to question whether the earth is a spinning sphere hurdling through space at 66,600 mph yet? or is NASA and that kind of science off the table for questioning still?
You can question it, but it would just be kind of stupid since it's the kind of thing that can be verified by anybody who wants to. If you don't know how, go educate yourself on how and build your own stuff like Galileo and Newton. Don't be a liberal and expect someone to do the work of convincing you. If you need convincing, you do it.
so you trust freemasons huh? there are no experiments that I can perform to demonstrate movement or curvature. believe me I've looked. of course I can verify the freemason math- I'm not saying its incorrect. Math doesn't prove the earth to be a moving sphere though. Observationally, the earth is flat and motionless.
This thread is precisely how scientism of flat earth stupidity is used to hide, conflate, and confuse what's actually going on. Flat earth is a jewish psyop.
It is absolutely untrue that anyone can verify the ball Earth model, which requires "spacetime" itself to be "curved" by mass and that the curvature is indistinguishable from acceleration. Oh yeah sure, General Relativity is established science that 99% of physicists agree on and it also happens to be so advanced you need several college courses (but no labs, lol) to understand. But trust us, the math is beautiful; nevermind we can't reconcile it with quantum mechanics which has way more evidence.
What is verifiable by anyone though is that NASA lied and still continues to lie to us: obviously shopped moon photos, harnesses and green screens on the ISS, air bubbles in spacewalks, hundreds of thousands of probe photos not released, 95% of newer raw photos blurry and unrecognizable.
All science is open for questioning. Some science is settled. But ask away!!
the science is settled sounds like something the ministry of truth might say. are there any experiments which demonstrate earths curvature or motion? please point me in the direction of them.
lol i thought the 66,600 was a joke till i looked it up.
So did I. It’s actually much worse than just that. The earths supposed axial tilt is 23.4 degrees.. which if you subtract from 90 degrees = 66.6
And the amount of supposed curvature in any base 10 miles is equivalent to 666.
1 mile = .666 feet of curve 10 miles = 66.6 feet of curve 100 miles = 6666 feet of curve.
The supposed diameter of the moon is 2160 miles which is 6x6x60, the average distance to the moon 239,000 miles is 6x60x666, the earths circumference is equal to 6x6x600 nautical miles and on and on.
And the whopper- if you do a base 26 alphabet cipher and add up the letters of National Aeronautics and Space Administration, it equals 666. How many coincidences does it take before it becomes mathematically impossible for it to be just coincidence?
(post is archived)