To me he doesn't seem to enjoy the whole idea he's exposing, he's calling for reforms, and that call is legitimate, it's true that congress men are mostly tech dumb and are therefore mostly unfit to argue back and forth against a tech guy like zuckerberg when they accuse him of this and that and he replies "no we don't do that". Yeah... How can you prove him wrong when you don't even begin to grasp the inner workings of his shit. It's like me trying to argue semantics in arab with an actual arab while I can't read or understand arab in the first place.
Now, having said that... Are the reforms he's proposing really a solution for "our problems" as opposed to (((our problems)))
In the end, that's where the debate ends up landing ultimately, as usual
(post is archived)