I am an architect myself in Europe and maybe I do not design the structures of high-rise buildings made of reinforced concrete myself, everyone in the industry knows that from the 1960s, at the design stage, any perforation of the structure, including demolition holes, is already planned, so as not to drill at the construction site because it is cheaper and so a lot of installer errors are eliminated.
I did not know that.
It does raise up another question I've always had that is difficult to relate to normies/laymen. Sounds like you can appreciate this though.
Building 7, I know, I know... but hear me
Official story: Fire somehow, fire scary, knock down building (pull it)
Ok fine, lets throw out all the theories, lets just pretend we believe this for a moment.
So this claim MUST become, through our deduction of surrounding facts, the claim in its totality is as follows:
1 - 9/11 happens, OMG panic, everyone going nuts downtown
2 - During this panic, trained demolitionists are quickly obtained (somehow)
3 - Firemen are dying, everyone is getting OUT, total bedlam
4 - During all this, those demolition crews RUSH into the building 7, while still on fire, sitting next to a falling skyscraper, and place professional and perfect demo blasts into all those pre-made demo holes.
We cannot possibly believe that anyone went into that building during that time, and did anything other than scream like a bitch and run back out the front door. Furthermore, no claim is ever made of how the demos got placed in the building.
They dont let skyscrapers operate from build time to decades later with packed explosives sitting live in them just in case. The demo holes already cut, that makes sense, but who and more importantly WHEN were LIVE explosives placed in those precut holes?
The long and short of it is: They will never try to claim a demo team ran inside and placed the charges, because thats insane, the expectation I suspect, is that no one will ask this question. How and when did the explosives get placed? Once the event started, it was already to late to get in there and do any work.
The explosives were already in the building. This ofc, raises the question of the other buildings and their reported explosions.
I don't have a source handy because I've long since accepted 9/11 as a FF and moved on to the Who and Why but I've seen it reported in a number of places that there was lots of after-hours maintenance happening on both of the towers for months leading up to the event. Perhaps similar things going on at WTC7 as well.
yea saw all that too and I would suspect it as well, the art students from israel etc...
When designing any structure, its life cycle, construction cost, maintenance and demolition costs should be estimated. My first project in the office, while still a student, was a project of demolition of a precision instruments factory and adaptation to the needs of a residential investment. In Europe, most demolitions are carried out with the use of excavators and explosions are rather an American specialty, but I end up working with international design offices, so I know something about it. The key supports of the structure are equipped with holes for explosives, but I do not think that the installation of cables, and most of all the explosives themselves, were placed during construction because they have a period of obsolescence and would expire, which would result in an explosion and an uncontrolled fall. In normal demolition, everything of value is first dismantled to recover raw materials such as electrical and ventilation equipment and installations, window frames and so on. In this case, it would be reasonable to assume that the explosives and probably the cable installation that held them together were installed shortly before demolition, most likely during some kind of renovation, but not enough to expire the explosives. I do not think such an installation would be possible in chaos and within a few hours. These three buildings had a total of 267 above-ground storeys and several dozen structural poles on each of them. Such an operation had to take weeks, it was probably divided into stages.
https://911crashtest.org/ode-to-yamasaki/
Check this out everyone
You have not specified what country you live in Europe...I have often wondered if in other countries, they know that the official 9/11 story of the U.S. is a lie. Like we're North Korea believing the lies of our government, while the rest of the world pities us.
The explosives were places the weekend before. The WTCs had all their power (cameras) shut off during that time as "a test." I read a story by someone that was supposedly there the weekend before trying to do computer work of some kind (I read this a long time ago).
When 9/11 happened, I was on vacation. I immediately told those I was with due to appropriate jew brainwashing, "This was probably the work of that guy Osama Bin Laden." When I was "right by intelligence agencies," man, was I smug. Until I realized I was the best jew puppet of them all.
I was in middle school watching it live on TV when it happened, and several of the people on the street who were interviewed after the buildings fell said they heard extremely loud noises and felt the ground rumble like an earthquake before anything fell down. At that time, I had been in my pyromaniac phase of childhood, and dreaming about growing up to be a building demolitionist so I could get paid to play with explosives as an adult. I had been watching videos of controlled demolitions on the internet. I could tell that the towers didn't fall because of the planes. I knew 9/11 was a false flag when I was fucking twelve.
But who the hell is going to listen to a twelve year old?
As another poster said, there were people going in and out of the building in the weeks leading up to 9/11. Additionally, ownership of the building or at least ownership of its security, changed hands shortly before 9/11. Some have theorized that the charges were installed in new smoke detectors throughout the towers.
I remember, after 9-11, there were people who worked in the WTC that said weeks? months? before 9-11 they would come in in the mornings and their desks would be covered in dust. Others saying that they would be locked out on random days so that maintenance could be done on their floor.
I'm not going to try to look for reliable sources. But I do remember there being lots of WTC workers giving evidence that there were many indications that explosives could have been put in place shortly before 9-11.
(post is archived)