> because fortunately it is built from Saudi passports
LMAO XD
Fucking solid right there.
> because fortunately it is built from Saudi passports
LMAO XD
Fucking solid right there.
Only one day had skyscrapers fall from fire.
Never happened before, or since.
They are designed to withstand fire and plane crashes, specifically, earthquakes too.
One in Russia (I think) burned for weeks. Didnt fall.
9/11 was a production. Couldnt let us stare at it for weeks, climactic all in one day and following is the charge to war.
Where did all that steel go? I dont mean later, I mean between up in the air and the ground. It turned to DUST.
9/11 D.E.W. and Dustification, into your search engine of choice, for those that dont already know this like the back of their own hand.
And on the first day in history that any steel-framed skyscraper fell due to fire, not one alone fell, but THREE. The smaller building 7 was not even struck by a plane, but fell due to some office fires on one or two levels of the building. Moreover, it too fell at freefall speed, not as if the unharmed floors were 'pancaking', but as though it imploded upon itself. It's one of the most outrageous reaches for an explanation in history.
Anyone that watches WT7 and doesn't think controlled demolition, has never seen an actual controlled demolition.
I am an architect myself in Europe and maybe I do not design the structures of high-rise buildings made of reinforced concrete myself, everyone in the industry knows that from the 1960s, at the design stage, any perforation of the structure, including demolition holes, is already planned, so as not to drill at the construction site because it is cheaper and so a lot of installer errors are eliminated.
I did not know that.
It does raise up another question I've always had that is difficult to relate to normies/laymen. Sounds like you can appreciate this though.
Building 7, I know, I know... but hear me
Official story: Fire somehow, fire scary, knock down building (pull it)
Ok fine, lets throw out all the theories, lets just pretend we believe this for a moment.
So this claim MUST become, through our deduction of surrounding facts, the claim in its totality is as follows:
1 - 9/11 happens, OMG panic, everyone going nuts downtown
2 - During this panic, trained demolitionists are quickly obtained (somehow)
3 - Firemen are dying, everyone is getting OUT, total bedlam
4 - During all this, those demolition crews RUSH into the building 7, while still on fire, sitting next to a falling skyscraper, and place professional and perfect demo blasts into all those pre-made demo holes.
We cannot possibly believe that anyone went into that building during that time, and did anything other than scream like a bitch and run back out the front door. Furthermore, no claim is ever made of how the demos got placed in the building.
They dont let skyscrapers operate from build time to decades later with packed explosives sitting live in them just in case. The demo holes already cut, that makes sense, but who and more importantly WHEN were LIVE explosives placed in those precut holes?
The long and short of it is: They will never try to claim a demo team ran inside and placed the charges, because thats insane, the expectation I suspect, is that no one will ask this question. How and when did the explosives get placed? Once the event started, it was already to late to get in there and do any work.
The explosives were already in the building. This ofc, raises the question of the other buildings and their reported explosions.
I don't have a source handy because I've long since accepted 9/11 as a FF and moved on to the Who and Why but I've seen it reported in a number of places that there was lots of after-hours maintenance happening on both of the towers for months leading up to the event. Perhaps similar things going on at WTC7 as well.
When designing any structure, its life cycle, construction cost, maintenance and demolition costs should be estimated. My first project in the office, while still a student, was a project of demolition of a precision instruments factory and adaptation to the needs of a residential investment. In Europe, most demolitions are carried out with the use of excavators and explosions are rather an American specialty, but I end up working with international design offices, so I know something about it. The key supports of the structure are equipped with holes for explosives, but I do not think that the installation of cables, and most of all the explosives themselves, were placed during construction because they have a period of obsolescence and would expire, which would result in an explosion and an uncontrolled fall. In normal demolition, everything of value is first dismantled to recover raw materials such as electrical and ventilation equipment and installations, window frames and so on. In this case, it would be reasonable to assume that the explosives and probably the cable installation that held them together were installed shortly before demolition, most likely during some kind of renovation, but not enough to expire the explosives. I do not think such an installation would be possible in chaos and within a few hours. These three buildings had a total of 267 above-ground storeys and several dozen structural poles on each of them. Such an operation had to take weeks, it was probably divided into stages.
The explosives were places the weekend before. The WTCs had all their power (cameras) shut off during that time as "a test." I read a story by someone that was supposedly there the weekend before trying to do computer work of some kind (I read this a long time ago).
When 9/11 happened, I was on vacation. I immediately told those I was with due to appropriate jew brainwashing, "This was probably the work of that guy Osama Bin Laden." When I was "right by intelligence agencies," man, was I smug. Until I realized I was the best jew puppet of them all.
As another poster said, there were people going in and out of the building in the weeks leading up to 9/11. Additionally, ownership of the building or at least ownership of its security, changed hands shortly before 9/11. Some have theorized that the charges were installed in new smoke detectors throughout the towers.
I remember, after 9-11, there were people who worked in the WTC that said weeks? months? before 9-11 they would come in in the mornings and their desks would be covered in dust. Others saying that they would be locked out on random days so that maintenance could be done on their floor.
I'm not going to try to look for reliable sources. But I do remember there being lots of WTC workers giving evidence that there were many indications that explosives could have been put in place shortly before 9-11.
The steel was melted into a big radioactive mass of iron at the bottom. Also the videos of explosions, hundred if witnesses of explosions etc.
Not to mention Silverstein making a "killing". Leasing the wtc 6 weeks before for a few million then after he gets an insurance payout of 4 billion or something.
Yeah and Silverstein, his son, and his daughter just all happened to be late/absent that day.
What are your thoughts on Howard Lutnick? The top floor CEO that survived while most of his employees died-he just happened to take his son to school that day.
The odigo israeli messaging app. It was reported in Israeli news that odigo sent out a warning about the attacks on the morning of 9/11. I was told that 400 Jews that aren't Israeli still died in 9/11
This is the event that woke me up, woke countless people up, I hope. If our government is capable of doing this to it's own citizens, they are capable of anything.
Of course it didn't collapse. You need jet fuel to melt steel beams.
Seems someone forgot about WTC 7 #neverforget
The airplanes were like bullets + grenades. You have a whole giant plane slamming into a building -- that is like a bullet -- but then because it's made of many parts, flying shrapnel is created, and that flies throughout the structure. These two things combined would cause a collapse. Okay, you wanna say that the buildings were really TNTed, fine. But don't act like airplanes couldn't cause the buildings to collapse.
Honest question -
Then why did building #7 collapse?
I will act like that because the skyscrapers were built with the possibility of planes hitting them in mind. Not to mention its been run through models hundreds of thousands of times and it can't be recreated.
So in short, planes couldn't cause the buildings to collapse.
I was about 20 when 9/11 happened, and the thing that stopped me in my tracks and made me immediately doubt the whole thing was the Todd Beamer "let's roll" guy, who supposedly helped take the plane down in Pennsylvania. I realized, hmm...So the plane that was headed for the most important target, the white house, was intercepted by a guy with a catch phrase? That his wife happened to overhear on a phone call with him? (If anyone is too young to remember, Todd Beamer's "Let's Roll", supposedly uttered before intercepting the terrorists, was proudly repeated by Americans as some patriotic phrase in the weeks following 9/11.) It sounded way too much to me like a movie plot that someone wrote in Hollywood; I knew it had to be bull. I would love to learn more about the wife; I have wondered if anyone has researched who she is and where she is now.
The news reporter sounds like a character off star wars.
For a Chinese skyscraper to not fall down under normal conditions is a miracle. This is blessed.
Clearly the commies used their good steel for this tower, or nobody tried to use a plane to start the fire.
Clearly the commies used their good steel for this tower
It would be interesting if the Chicoms built their tower from imported American Steel.
That dialect of Chinese is awful.
Did an aeroplane hit it?
Naw that kind of stuff only happens on TV (youtu.be)
And in NY
Airplanes have no impact on the stability of such a structure because they do not have sufficient mass or impact energy. The load on the structure of such buildings is much more influenced by the daily wind load or, possibly, snow load than by any particular plane.
Weird, they didn’t collapse in windy or snowy conditions for 30 years.
The load on the structure is also influenced by ....my dyiiiiiiiiccckkkk
That's good. I think
Was it hit with an airplane? What happened?
Probably someone was cooking bat soup.
No ((((((((((Lucky Larry))))))))) to say "pull it"
(post is archived)