did you suggest if he was more keen he'd start his own youtube instead of develop a coalition against anti-competitive practices on youtube?
did you suggest if he was more keen he'd start his own youtube instead of develop a coalition against anti-competitive practices on youtube?
Note: I'm familiar with all sides of the argument you are alluding to. Let me play the devils advocate here:
WHAT anti-competitive practices? Against WHOM?
This isn't bait. I want to hear your thinking on this.
Note: I'm familiar with all sides of the argument you are alluding to. Let me play the devils advocate here:
WHAT anti-competitive practices? Against WHOM?
This isn't bait. I want to hear your thinking on this.
anti-competive? no im sorry i shouldnt of used that word. it means youtube is illegaly dealing with competition.
i should have said anti-trust.
can i go ahead and explain that one?
anti-competive? no im sorry i shouldnt of used that word. it means youtube is illegaly dealing with competition.
i should have said anti-trust.
can i go ahead and explain that one?
Again, not baiting you at all. Go ahead, how is youtube behaving in a way that would trigger anti-trust laws?
EDIT: I have an end goal in mind by the way, I'm asking the questions with a goal in mind.
Again, not baiting you at all. Go ahead, how is youtube behaving in a way that would trigger anti-trust laws?
EDIT: I have an end goal in mind by the way, I'm asking the questions with a goal in mind.
(post is archived)