Comments are turned off
lol
> Comments are turned off
lol
I can't even stand the bitch for 5 seconds.
I can't even stand the bitch for 5 seconds.
I listened to this entire presentation. I was making breakfast, so I didn't watch her body language. I am biased, I recognize my bias. Usually, I search for stories and videos that confirm my bias. This video does the opposite for confirming my bias. However, thinking outside of the box, as my brain has been trained, I often take the perspective of the villain/offender. I would say this is a critical thinking exercise to ensure I am not being duped. I was already primed to take this anti-perspective based on your post description and the video title, and after listening to this woman for a minute or two my brain would have made the jump to the opposition regardless. Even were this written text rather than audio I would have taken the opposing view.
I don't relish being 'correct/right,' and I don't like telling people that they are 'wrong.' But if you aren't able to look at yourself or your situation from a completely removed perspective, you have no place giving advice or telling other people how to live.
This woman was given a platform, with who knows how many thousands or millions of dollars to support the overhead of this project. She even speaks of herself having a staff to support her work. From this position, she laughingly spews her self-righteousness about attacking a group or groups who don't believe her ideology. And with the same breath, recoils from the response of the people she attacks. Recognize your battle before you engage.
I am not sure how many dozens of times she mentioned mental health, depression, therapy, therapist, sadness, but it became a concurrent theme along with her main point of internet troll defense. Myself, I couldn't seperate her complete lack empathy with her targets for the exact same anguish she espoused to feel. Craziness. It was like: "How dare you defend youself? How dare you traumatize me when I'm trying to traumatize you? How dare you attack my peers to ostracize me, that's what I'm doing to YOU." I don't agree with everything Jordan Peterson says, but at least he criticizes himself while he thinks critically about a subject.
The short version of this comment would be three words: define cognitive dissonance.
After writing this, I've realized this is more a critique on females than on the SJW culture. Or maybe it's a description of symptoms resulting from a lack of spirituality or religion. She sought meaning, and found an ideology into which, entirely, she could throw herself. When holes in her ideology were exposed, she experienced mental anguish, because she couldn't understand the imperfection of her religion. I use this same thought process to explain welfare recipients and their subsequent behavior. They want handouts, because it is easier. But deep in the subconscious realize it is slavery without a way to consciously confront or overcome the problem. The result: acting-out through violence or drug use or depression.
In conclusion, end all welfare, and, I guess, don't listen too closley to what women have to say.
I listened to this entire presentation. I was making breakfast, so I didn't watch her body language. I am biased, I recognize my bias. Usually, I search for stories and videos that confirm my bias. This video does the opposite for confirming my bias. However, thinking outside of the box, as my brain has been trained, I often take the perspective of the villain/offender. I would say this is a critical thinking exercise to ensure I am not being duped. I was already primed to take this anti-perspective based on your post description and the video title, and after listening to this woman for a minute or two my brain would have made the jump to the opposition regardless. Even were this written text rather than audio I would have taken the opposing view.
I don't relish being 'correct/right,' and I don't like telling people that they are 'wrong.' But if you aren't able to look at yourself or your situation from a completely removed perspective, you have no place giving advice or telling other people how to live.
This woman was given a platform, with who knows how many thousands or millions of dollars to support the overhead of this project. She even speaks of herself having a staff to support her work. From this position, she laughingly spews her self-righteousness about attacking a group or groups who don't believe her ideology. And with the same breath, recoils from the response of the people she attacks. Recognize your battle before you engage.
I am not sure how many dozens of times she mentioned mental health, depression, therapy, therapist, sadness, but it became a concurrent theme along with her main point of internet troll defense. Myself, I couldn't seperate her complete lack empathy with her targets for the exact same anguish she espoused to feel. Craziness. It was like: "How dare you defend youself? How dare you traumatize me when I'm trying to traumatize you? How dare you attack my peers to ostracize me, that's what I'm doing to YOU." I don't agree with everything Jordan Peterson says, but at least he criticizes himself while he thinks critically about a subject.
The short version of this comment would be three words: define cognitive dissonance.
After writing this, I've realized this is more a critique on females than on the SJW culture. Or maybe it's a description of symptoms resulting from a lack of spirituality or religion. She sought meaning, and found an ideology into which, entirely, she could throw herself. When holes in her ideology were exposed, she experienced mental anguish, because she couldn't understand the imperfection of her religion. I use this same thought process to explain welfare recipients and their subsequent behavior. They want handouts, because it is easier. But deep in the subconscious realize it is slavery without a way to consciously confront or overcome the problem. The result: acting-out through violence or drug use or depression.
In conclusion, end all welfare, and, I guess, don't listen too closley to what women have to say.
That's an interesting point of view.
That's an interesting point of view.
(post is archived)