"We've all had our vaccinations. And we continue to since we've lost dad," says John Cross's daughter. "But now you start to question. If a rare, unusual thing were to take place, the system's not got your back. It's not there for you... is it worth the risk?"
Will she ever find out that these things are not rare?
So she wouldn’t care if they got compensated?
This is weird logic. An experimental vaccine is never worth the risk unless you’re already dying.
Agreed, or if suffering an illness or health issue that isn't treatable with conventional means/ pharmaceuticals, then sure go for an experimental if you are fully informed of the risks vs benefit etc.
Back about 10 or more years ago i was part of a Gilead Sciences trial for an experimental drug to mitigate liver damage (scarring). Every three weeks was having to give over 15 vials of blood for the first three-six months.
I did the whole cohort of primary, secondary and tertiary long term / two year follow up ( it was successful in my case )
I just shook my head at everyone lining up for an 'experimental' vaccine and then telling me that all the safety data says it's 'safe and effective'. 'Experimental' in this context is literally the definition of having no data !.
EDIT: I had to read pages and pages of informed consent and sign them all before they would even begin discussing the trial with me. These people signed a half page of basically - 'yep im good to go and know absolutely nothing about what is being injected'.
(post is archived)