direct link (x.com)
They said that as long as authorities say a mandate is for “public health,”
then the courts shouldn’t question them.
…
This means that the Ninth Circuit’s egregious ruling—that it doesn’t matter
whether a shot stops transmission or infection, all that matters is that a
state official could have believed a shot would help individual members of
the public—will stand.
[direct link](https://x.com/theHFDF/status/2056509036103958977)
> They said that as long as authorities say a mandate is for “public health,”
> then the courts shouldn’t question them.
>
> …
>
> This means that the Ninth Circuit’s egregious ruling—that it doesn’t matter
> whether a shot stops transmission or infection, all that matters is that a
> state official could have believed a shot would help individual members of
> the public—will stand.
