They’re not releasing the data because of the distress it would cause.
“we accept the suggestion that there is a real risk that some people would be contacted about a deceased relative once the data set was published. We conclude that for some (but not for others) being approached about this data or finding out about it, would be distressing…”. To reach the relevant legal threshold, the Tribunal had to be satisfied that this kind of distress would be likely to manifest in a serious psychological condition such as PTSD. On the basis of an unevidenced assertion by Nafilyan that it would, the Tribunal accepted that this risk had been established.
Officially buried.
They’re not releasing the data because of the distress it would cause.
> “we accept the suggestion that there is a real risk that some people would be contacted about a deceased relative once the data set was published. We conclude that for some (but not for others) being approached about this data or finding out about it, would be distressing…”. To reach the relevant legal threshold, the Tribunal had to be satisfied that this kind of distress would be likely to manifest in a serious psychological condition such as PTSD. On the basis of an unevidenced assertion by Nafilyan that it would, the Tribunal accepted that this risk had been established.
Officially buried.