No Amnesty for you, traitor.
No Amnesty for you, traitor.
This is the correct answer.
This is the correct answer.
TLDR:
"I am a doctor and I was baffled!"
Comments:
"I'm a retired truck driver and knew the vaccines were bullshit from day 1. You are a doctor and didn't know? I'll never trust the medical establishment again."
Everything about COVID and the vaccines has a jew behind it, folks. From the gain-of-function research, to the scientists, to the executives, to the health authorities, to the marketing and distribution, to the insurance companies, to the online opinion shaping and censorship, to the government psychological operations.
TLDR:
>"I am a doctor and I was baffled!"
Comments:
>"I'm a retired truck driver and knew the vaccines were bullshit from day 1. You are a doctor and didn't know? I'll never trust the medical establishment again."
Everything about COVID and the vaccines has a jew behind it, folks. From the gain-of-function research, to the scientists, to the executives, to the health authorities, to the marketing and distribution, to the insurance companies, to the online opinion shaping and censorship, to the government psychological operations.
In the best case (which does not apply to her) it is YOUR job to make sure that the medicine you give has side effects listed to patient And that the patient properly consents. You failed Your job, someone got hurt, someone died, that is YOUR fault.
"How will people trust vaccines again?" You'll have to think hard about that one, on your days remaining death row.
**In the best case** (which does not apply to her) it is *YOUR* job to make sure that the medicine you give has side effects listed to patient **And** that the patient properly consents. You failed *Your* job, someone got hurt, someone died, that is **YOUR** fault.
"How will people trust vaccines again?" You'll have to think hard about that one, on your days remaining death row.
No forgetting. No forgiving.
No forgetting. No forgiving.
The study (archive.ph) she talks about is marked as “retracted”, but it’s still available online.
The [study](https://archive.ph/pCreJ) she talks about is marked as “retracted”, but it’s still available online.
NO, SHE WAS FOOLED!!.
NO, SHE WAS FOOLED!!.
Complete video, snippet above is at circa minute 37, anything after minute 40 is just ad content: https://vid8.poal.co/user/webrustler/NarCIVu
Live on 20.02.2024 0:00 Intro and Dr. Boz ratio 2:18 Vaccine peer review article 6:11 Introduction and messenger RNA 12:00 Trial study 21:20 Trial arm vs treatment arm 27:09 Reporting time delays 33:21 When DNA is introduced into the body
35:00 spike proteins inside the cardiac cells 39:25 CGM prescriptions available on bozmd.com 42:55 Q&A
I want to say I'm glad she came around, even if it might just be CYA. Additionally, she has a platform to wake up more people.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10810638/ ("Retracted")
Edit: Study PDF https://files.catbox.moe/0luhll.pdf
Retraction
The Editors-in-Chief have retracted this article. Following publication, concerns were raised regarding a number of claims made in this article. Upon further review, the Editors-in-Chief found that the conclusions of this narrative review are considered to be unreliable due to the concerns with the validity of some of the cited references that support the conclusions and a misrepresentation of the cited references and available data.
The authors disagree with this retraction.
Response to retraction from same doctor: https://youtu.be/p3F38nsP5Rw
And from McCullough: https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/breaking-springer-nature-cureus-journal
Complete video, snippet above is at circa minute 37, anything after minute 40 is just ad content:
https://vid8.poal.co/user/webrustler/NarCIVu
>Live on 20.02.2024
0:00 Intro and Dr. Boz ratio
2:18 Vaccine peer review article
6:11 Introduction and messenger RNA
12:00 Trial study
21:20 Trial arm vs treatment arm
27:09 Reporting time delays
33:21 When DNA is introduced into the body
35:00 spike proteins inside the cardiac cells
39:25 CGM prescriptions available on bozmd.com
42:55 Q&A
I want to say I'm glad she came around, even if it might just be CYA.
Additionally, she has a platform to wake up more people.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10810638/ ("Retracted")
Edit: Study PDF https://files.catbox.moe/0luhll.pdf
>Retraction
>
The Editors-in-Chief have retracted this article. Following publication, concerns were raised regarding a number of claims made in this article. Upon further review, the Editors-in-Chief found that the conclusions of this narrative review are considered to be unreliable due to the concerns with the validity of some of the cited references that support the conclusions and a misrepresentation of the cited references and available data.
>
The authors disagree with this retraction.
Response to retraction from same doctor: https://youtu.be/p3F38nsP5Rw
And from McCullough: https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/breaking-springer-nature-cureus-journal
She still doesn't get a pass.
She still doesn't get a pass.
This was a society wide NPC test. Everyone who failed must never be allowed to vote again or hold any power over others. They have been tried and failed. Companies demanded legal immunity before releasing an untested medical product and people accepted this. No other facts matter.
Crying about what you were "told" is just admission that you can't think for yourself.
This was a society wide NPC test. Everyone who failed must never be allowed to vote again or hold any power over others. They have been tried and failed. Companies demanded legal immunity before releasing an untested medical product and people accepted this. No other facts matter.
Crying about what you were "told" is just admission that you can't think for yourself.
(post is archived)