I was just diagnosed with the same cancer. I didn't take the vax. I doubt she did either. I also doubt she has cancer. The black and white shirt she is wearing in her video makes me feel like it's a psyop.

Or she doesn’t have cancer at all. This will “humanize” the pedophilic lizards at bickingjam palace.

I don't think they ever said what the abdominal surgery was for.

Someone that high up will have been given a placebo. Maybe she was offed or given the cancer because she objected to her children being molested. Or her husband caught some nasty STD on one of his trips to pedoland and that caused her medical problems. They are very specific about ailments of other royals, so you know they’re lying/hiding when they won’t tell you what exactly is wrong with her. Also, the Middletons aren’t commoners, they’re listed in the peerage. Just mentioning that because a recent article called her a “commoner”.

All that hubbub about the doctored photo was to derail you and get your mind off the fact she’s gone or very ill. “Look here, not there!”

Take the vax. Pay the tax.

Good riddance.

There's no way she was stupid enough to take the toxic experimental poison. This is covering something else up.

I thought the elites knew not to take the experimental and toxic poison and instead took saline solution during their propaganda photo ops?

Who in their right mind would poison themselves for no reason? Especially if rich and famous?

That article quotes a lot of stupidity in the /pol analysis of this video.

I’m watching posted to Twitter in full screen mode.

The “strange movement” they’re seeing in the video is mostly likely the temporal video compression ignoring subtle changes until a fly breaks the threshold that forces it to encode something.

I don’t see anything unusual to the right of her head at 1:20. These people may have been watching a more compressed version of the video than what I saw. Temporal compression does odd things at low bit rates.

The mysterious stripes on her shirt showing up in her shadow are her reflection on the painted, polished, wooden bench.

I hear no audio distortion at 1:40. She says “to us both” in an abbreviated, British way. It might sound odd if you’re not used to her dialect.

Her left eyebrow looks the same as it always does.

To anyone who has spent time outside listening to birds (likely not many /pol posters) hearing them make a repeated chorus in response to one another is perfectly natural. They really do sit in the trees and bleat the same thing over and over again and wait their turn while other birds do the same thing.

Even if they did add some bird sounds in post it only means they’re trying to make the video more pleasant.

One of the flies lands on her hair and flies off at 0:29. She was not recorded in front of a green screen.

You can also see the bright sunlight on her hair fade as it fades in the background.

I appreciate the skepticism and analysis on /pol, but none of those comments are worth quoting. Every detail they told me to examine was a waste of my time. Either this author’s “moderately-trained eye” failed him, or he didn’t bother to look closely at the video before he quoted all of that nonsense.