A 2015 FDA document called “Design and Analysis of Shedding Studies for Virus or Bacteria-Based Gene Therapy and Oncolytic Products” defines shedding as “the release of [viral or bacterial gene therapy products] … from the patient through one or all of the following ways: excreta (feces); secreta (urine, saliva, nasopharyngeal fluids etc.); or through the skin (pustules, sores, wounds).”

The shedding only occurs with virus or bacteria-based (((vaxxines))) because you need a live biological vector that is capable of infecting a person in order for the vaxx to jump to another person. The lipid nanocluster mRNA (((vaxxines))) will not shed because they do not have a proper vector to ride along in. Same goes for other spike protein vaxxes like (((Novavax))). There is no mechanism for proteins or mRNA to shed and transmit into another host by external means. If that were possible, we'd be altered by every bit of mRNA/RNA/DNA we eat or come into contact with. Same goes for proteins- we cannot shed and/or intake proteins purely by contact. So given all that, only viral or bacterial (((vaxxes))) have any chance of shedding. The J&J and Sputnik (((vaxxes))) can do this, but not the (((Moderna))) or (((Pfizer))) ones.

I read some time back that while shedding of something does definitely occur, the shed particles don't cause the recipient's DNA to change. Can some more science-minded person weigh in on this?