Here are two related comments I had made in the past on this topic if anyone is interested in reading them: - The first is when someone mentioned a number of ~2 billion dead within 2-3 years from the jew injection and my comment about 2 billion possibly being either not far off, or actually quite low. (I focused on deaths from myocarditis alone without the effects of additional wrenches in the machinery causing more deaths; the effects of the jew injection mentioned in the OP link would be such "additional wrenches" that would cause even more deaths.) - The second is about population reduction and density. Due to the suppression of reporting on the increase in deaths by media, politicians and the 'healthcare industry', how many would need to die before people would start to notice that there are fewer people around, then how much longer before they question what is going on and put the pieces together. First: >I think you are not very far off with your estimation of ~2 billion dead within 2-3 years. > >If "official" estimate of the world population by the (((UN))) is believed to be close to accurate: >>Claimed current world population is about ~8,050,700,000 > >If the "official" estimate of the percentage of the world population that has been given the kike injection is believed: >>72.3% of the people in the world have the kike injection in them >>>Claimed estimate of the current world population that is injected is about ~5,820,656,000 >>>Resulting in ~2,230,044,000 that remain uninjected > >If 20% of the claimed 5.8 billion injected are/will be afflicted with myocarditis: >>1,164,131,000 > >If 50% of those with injection-afflicted myocarditis will be dead within 5 years of injection: >>582,065,000 > >This number is only an estimate of deaths due to myocarditis affliction, not total deaths attributable to the kike injection which myocarditis is only a fraction. > >Going by the deaths caused by myocarditis alone, this is also based on the belief that the myocarditis that the injected are afflicted with is merely on the same level of deadliness as "normal" 1 in 1 million (0.000001%) myocarditis that has a <5 year death rate of 50%. > >I believe the myocarditis inflicted by the kike injection is likely not "normal" myocarditis, but much worse. I believe the jewjuice-inflicted myocarditis is far more deadly due to the injection also inflicting a wide range of other damage to the bodies of people injected with it. Injected might have their death attributed to being caused by 'only' myocarditis, but I suspect the presence of a host of other damages done by the injection will increase the 50% death rate within 5 years among those with myocarditis to be a much higher percentage. > >The above death count is also not taking into account the deaths caused by the other effects to the body that the injection inflicts separately from myocarditis and which will result in death even on their own. > >Considering the results of how all the animals that were given the kike injection during testing had all died, I believe deaths that are occurring now and which will continue to occur over the next 2-3 years will be far higher than the 582 million noted above that would result from myocarditis alone even if the 50% death rate of "normal" myocarditis persists with this jewjuice-inflicted myocarditis. > >Going over dozens of variables that will contribute to the removal of people from existence over the next 2-3 years, I think the total 'direct' reduction in population by 2025/2026 worldwide will likely be close to 2.5/3 billion. > >Systems thinking and analyzing how facets of world societies are reliant on the current amount of people existing would mean there will be additional deaths beyond those directly attributed to the injections. > >Due to breakdown of segments of societies due to not enough people remaining to run various services that are required to maintain some societies and the current way of life, I believe the effects this large of a reduction in population over such a "short" time frame will have on the world will also result in a further reduction in population. > >I might be thinking worst case and making poor guesses and estimates, but I could also be underestimating and 4 billion might even be far too low of an estimate. > >And all this is 'present course' without any additional (((wrenches))) being thrown into the gears of the world machine by kikes, which we are all surely aware that they have plenty of wrenches they'll be throwing at us to wipe us out. --- Second: >I suspect part of the normalization of perpetual "Help Wanted" signs and "Nobody wants to work" statements is part of the kike genocide injection agenda to mask the increase in deaths so people don't start to notice the population reduction until it is blatantly in their face. > >It conditions the population to expect a high turnover rate at businesses and to get used to seeing/speaking to a different employee each time. I suspect it isn't that people aren't wanting to work, or only working briefly before not returning, but that they are dying and the companies have a standing 'order' for replacements by being in a state of 'always hiring'. > >It also conditions the population to expect decreased production of goods due to supposedly lacking workers, and also interruptions to supply at stores due to supposedly lacking truck drivers to transport the goods that are produced. > >Couple this with the switch to "tele-commuting" and working from home push that the kike lockdown agenda instituted and many workers are no longer seen in person. People who do certain jobs completely off-site and remotely are easily replaced if one experiences a sudden and unexpected death. > >The genocide is already occurring - people just aren't yet noticing the population reduction due to chaos, distractions, censorship and propaganda. > >If the "official" estimate of the population of the USA is believed, we are currently at ~334,234,000. >Would anyone even notice if 1% (3,342,000) disappeared? > >How many would notice that there are maybe a couple fewer cars on the interstate during the commute to work for those who still work in person? > >How many would notice fewer people at the store while shopping and not immediately blame it on (((covid))) or on lack of supply of goods in the store being the cause for fewer people shopping there? > >Does it need to reach 5% reduction before anyone really starts to notice? ~16,711,700 >10%? ~33,423,400 >15%? ~50,135,100 >How high does it need to go before those who do notice start to ask others if they are noticing as well? 25%? ~83,558,500 > >Expand this reduction out to every major country with a focus toward estimates following the list of countries that are supposedly the most-injected. >Is there already a 100mil reduction in population worldwide? >200mil? >500mil? > >Censorship and narrative control online means almost nothing on the level of death we are already at can be gleaned from online. Some are still managing to draw attention to what is going on, but one needs to go almost entirely by personal experience, by talking to others and taking note of population density and turnover rate at jobs to see what is already going on and to gauge how fast the genocide is occurring. > >Now take into account that they are also increasing the rate which they are flooding non-White invaders into our countries. The reduction in population due to death-by-injection might not even be able to be noticed by anyone due to these invaders immediately stepping into the places of people who die from the injections.