What was the specific claim about 100% of the animals dying? I remember people talking about it, but I can't recollect ever seeing the source they were referring to
https://poal.co/s/Vax/663051/f9ddd25b-2131-41ed-8305-5700c7ffa318#cmnts
The claims have absolutely nothing to do with the topic at hand.
What was the specific claim about 100% of the animals dying? I remember people talking about it, but I can't recollect ever seeing the source they were referring to
The claim, while I can't give exact wording because it was in so many variations all over the place, went like this:
During animal testing/trials, mRNA vaccines resulted in all of the test animals dying from the vaccine.
Again, not an exact quote, but good luck finding a source that can be quoted and verified as fact. This claim/statement and the article can't be reconciled because they claim opposite outcomes.
To be fair, they totally could be reconciled for a specific time frame with regards to animals being raised for slaughter. From what I've gathered the clot shots actually do give you a very short lived length of protection that starts to slowly wane and then dips negative. If this held true for use in livestock, it wouldn't matter if they ended up with long term lowered and eventually destroyed immune systems, because the long term plan for them is already the slaughter house.
But again, that's just me pointing out how it could work in a scenario. I still want to see the original source that everyone was using for all the animals dying.
Clot shots kill because of the spike protein being the most dangerous part of the vaccine and they clog your capillaries and organs up. The clot shot is a completely different then other experimental mRna shots.
(post is archived)