To be fair, they totally could be reconciled for a specific time frame with regards to animals being raised for slaughter. From what I've gathered the clot shots actually do give you a very short lived length of protection that starts to slowly wane and then dips negative. If this held true for use in livestock, it wouldn't matter if they ended up with long term lowered and eventually destroyed immune systems, because the long term plan for them is already the slaughter house.
But again, that's just me pointing out how it could work in a scenario. I still want to see the original source that everyone was using for all the animals dying.
Clot shots kill because of the spike protein being the most dangerous part of the vaccine and they clog your capillaries and organs up. The clot shot is a completely different then other experimental mRna shots.
No, mRNA causes your ribosomes to produce a foreign protein. For any viral mRNA vaccine, that is going to be a viral protein. Having your own cells produce a viral protein indefinitely is bound to cause long term autoimmune disease.
But not clots, it was preplanned. They could’ve used the nucleus and it would’ve still caused autoimmune problems and deaths but not clots on the scale it does. The spike is even somewhat dangerous with a case of Covid, the nucleus isn’t.
(post is archived)