The very first RNA-based livestock vaccine, a swine influenza (H3N2) RNA shot licensed in 2012, was developed by Harrisvaccines. The company followed up with an avian influenza mRNA shot in 2015. Harrisvaccines was acquired by Merck Animal Health later that year.
CureVac developed an mRNA-based rabies shot for pigs in 2016.
The swine vaccine platform Sequivity, introduced in 2018, was developed by Merck in partnership with Moderna. Sequivity can produce endlessly customized “vaccines,” none of which undergo safety testing.
If that is true, then the claim which was passed around during the plandemic that all mRNA vaccines tested on animals resulted in 100% death of the animals is completely false. So which one is it? Have mRNA (((vaxx))) been effectively used in animals for more than a decade or do mRNA (((vaxx))) shots result in animal deaths? They both can't be true. Who's lying here?
And the last time this was mentioned a few months ago it was poultry first, then swine and finally cattle. I know the cattle association and pork whatever came out and said they were sticking with traditional shots. Not sure about poultry.
Why we’re pharma company employees and congress exempted from the shots?
And yes they do kill, sometimes immediately and sometimes from various other causes awhile later which can be weeks to a few years.
I have a close relative who was a director at a major university hospital that did level 3 research. He got tired of the whiny doctors, when the director spot opened at a satellite campus that only did research he took it.
The animals all died, it was a running joke. They were studying two diseases that animals carry that are extremely deadly if caught. Two female researchers over the course of 15 years died. One forgot her face shield and got some bodily fluid in her eye. She was quarantined in a special room, no family, nothing. No, hey let me try that mRna vaccine. She was dead within two weeks just like the other lady had.
This relative “retired” early from a job that paid over 250 a year after his and every researchers medical and religious waivers were denied. The university/hospital fucked up though. They brought in replacements and said they had to bring them up to train them and bring them up to speed within the month when they’d be terminated.
The only catch is that nobody was being offered severance or unemployment. There was no incentive lmao. Nobody helped them, they may have even “lost” things. My relative sat in his office and did nothing and his replacement was so frustrated he’d try to start physical fights and would have to be escorted off the property by security.
You don’t lose 250+ researchers a director and staff that have been experimenting with mRna for 10+ years for no reason.
And there have been human trials before on small groups with aids and cancers that had no hope, all died but they would’ve died anyways but it was from weird stuff not the disease itself.
Each mRna shot has its own dangers, I don’t know what they specifically are but for the clot shot the spike protein is the most dangerous part of the virus and accumulates, blocking capillaries, organs etc. and I’m not sure if the adjuvants for the clot shot versus the mRna shots before.
In my opinion and from what some researchers said, these old elite bastards want to live forever and need mRna to work to reverse aging/diseases. It’s always been unethical to do mass trials and this is their opportunity to try and refine and perfect the treatments for them on a massive scale.
These are livestock animals destined for slaughter so there's a nearly 100% mortality rate there. I'm not an expert but I believe the vaccine being tested was intended for human use not these designed for swine.
These are livestock animals destined for slaughter so there's a nearly 100% mortality rate there.
While they are destined for slaughter, it would be pointless to give a slaughter animal a vaccine close to its time of demise. It would be most likely that the swine would be injected shortly after birth and would be raised to a specific age/size before slaughter. That amount of time raising them is likely comparable to the amount of time the mRNA animal testing would have run as well.
I'm not an expert but I believe the vaccine being tested was intended for human use not these designed for swine.
The claims that all mRNA vaccine testing preformed on animals resulted in total death was never clear what the intended target organism was. It was simply said that in past (((pre-covid))) testing of mRNA vaccines that the test animals all perished after being vaxxed. No source of this claim ever indicated what was being tested precisely, what the intended target organism was, who did the testing, how long the testing ran or what the actual data of the results were. These missing but critical data points and for this articles claims are the reason I am questioning the two being at odds. Someone is lying, but it cannot be determined which side it is. All I can say for sure is that both outcomes cannot be true at the same time. There are incentives on both sides to lie so how can this be sorted out?
Both sides have something to gain. It may be muddled but I'm going to err on the side of caution and buy my pork from farmers that don't use these vaccines. Worst case, I'm spending more but supporting local small farmers. I can live with that.
I don't trust that the human variant was tested enough or that it's safe. I don't see a reason that wouldn't also be the case for the livestock variant.
The difference I suppose is that this was done pre-covid and involves far less money than the human variant. Still no reason to trust Merck or the technology.
all mRNA vaccines tested on animals resulted in 100% death of the animals is completely false
The context was test animals prior to human trials. Which is true. All test animals were either outright killed by the injections or their heath eventually declined to such a degree they were euthanized.
What was the specific claim about 100% of the animals dying? I remember people talking about it, but I can't recollect ever seeing the source they were referring to
https://poal.co/s/Vax/663051/f9ddd25b-2131-41ed-8305-5700c7ffa318#cmnts
The claims have absolutely nothing to do with the topic at hand.
What was the specific claim about 100% of the animals dying? I remember people talking about it, but I can't recollect ever seeing the source they were referring to
The claim, while I can't give exact wording because it was in so many variations all over the place, went like this:
During animal testing/trials, mRNA vaccines resulted in all of the test animals dying from the vaccine.
Again, not an exact quote, but good luck finding a source that can be quoted and verified as fact. This claim/statement and the article can't be reconciled because they claim opposite outcomes.
To be fair, they totally could be reconciled for a specific time frame with regards to animals being raised for slaughter. From what I've gathered the clot shots actually do give you a very short lived length of protection that starts to slowly wane and then dips negative. If this held true for use in livestock, it wouldn't matter if they ended up with long term lowered and eventually destroyed immune systems, because the long term plan for them is already the slaughter house.
But again, that's just me pointing out how it could work in a scenario. I still want to see the original source that everyone was using for all the animals dying.
(post is archived)