Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (36).
[–] • 1 pt (edited )

Anyone have a link to the actual article. Would like to see context and what nonsense gobblygook is authored. Searched the Nature database by date and key words - nothing comes up for either. But i am half retarded.

EDIT Found it Fcking paywalled.

EDIT2 and

My considered laymans opinion - complete adjusted conflation correlation bull shittery. Ergo 'get boosted faggots'.

[–] • 0 pt

I figured it was just garbage, so I didn't really go any farther. The title was enough lulz for all.

[–] • 1 pt

Oh yeah totally. I sometimes like to hone my laymans skills by looking at their data and deriving the obvious logical or bad input fallacy it falls under. 'le correlation doesn't mean causation'. Next up - 'does having red hair mean you're more likely to experience covid 19'.. Climate change.

[–] • 0 pt

I think you may have the next hit piece with the red hair thing.