Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

Twit: https://twitter.com/RenzTom/status/1642229969555259395 Edit: [Related poal post](https://poal.co/s/Jewspiracy/627006)

(post is archived)

[–] • 9 pts

We need more concrete info than a random guy's tweet for this to catch on.

[–] • 3 pts (edited )

Tomas Renz also appeared before the Committee strongly pushing the informed consent bill. The clip is around somewhere. EDIT: Have edited , i had his stance back to front , wheeeeew.

[+] [deleted] • 0 pt
[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

I don't care much for it "catching on"

Just wanted to put the info out there. He who has ears to hear let him hear.

[–] • 5 pts

It's pretty damn important that it does catch on.

[–] [deleted] • 5 pts

I used to think so. Now I just inform the people in my life and move on. Whehter or not the "public" knows is irrlevant. People will follow whichever shepherd they prefer.

[–] • 6 pts (edited )

~~ for a recent or current session in MO.~~

The risk is real, but I don't know if HB1169 is real. Currently this is in the bucket with 5G and snake venom. Upgraded to, "possible."

6% of the population is probably swearing off of beef and pork now, which may be the actual op.

[–] • 6 pts

6% of the population is probably swearing off of beef and pork now, which may be the actual op.

They can't force us off as they have been trying to do for a while now, but getting us to voluntarily reject eating beef and pork is an even better option. They knew this. They had to setup the game though so we would voluntarily comply. This is how jewish tricks work.

[–] • 5 pts

the only meat that will be clean will be expensive.
poison for us. ambrosia for them.

[–] [deleted] • 6 pts

poison for us. ambrosia for them.

that isn't very different from how it already works.

cheap food today is loaded with poison. mRNA is more poison, sure. But one has always been required to spend extra time/money to get the better quality, non-poison food.

[–] • 4 pts
[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

missed that one, thanks for the additional info

[–] • 2 pts

Since it can only kill their livestock and offers no value, and can only lower the value of their product, why would anyone want to do this?

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

Not sure. But if the regulations change, or some large farmers association decides to unilaterally make the decision to require the vax, then other members will have to follow suit or lose membership.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

Maybe so. Sure seems like a door is open for other groups to quickly come out of nowhere which doesn't support this bullshit? Who wants to pay money to destroy the market value of their own product?

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts (edited )

It is definitely not logical. But they can pressure as they usually do. Increase fees or costs to produce if you don't vax your animals. It's like what they've been doing to farmers in the USA for decades now. Using fees and other regulatory burdens to increase the cost to operate (can only buy monsanto seeds, can't reuse seeds, have to use certain pesticides, etc. etc.). Making it more cost effective to simply sell your farm land to real estate developers than to actually produce food.

Edit: note: this hasn't actually gone into effect. The tweet makes it sound like it's inevitable, but this could very well be big-agg trying to "test the waters" to see how negatively the public would react to something like that.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Maybe bc they have control of the instruments for all the worlds wealth along with the funding infrastructure and coupled with a long held open disdain of 'useless eaters and breeders' - a quick default would be just another vector of population reduction.

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

Since mRNA does make physical changes to the body of the injected, it should be possible to create a handheld scanner that can determine if the meat has, or has not, been injected with mRNA.

This may be a huge money-making opportunity for those with the proper scientific/engineering background.

[–] [deleted] • 3 pts

This may be a huge money-making opportunity for those with the proper scientific/engineering background.

Until the inventor gets arrested for "medical misinformation"

[–] • 2 pts

it should be possible to create a handheld scanner that can determine if the meat has, or has not, been injected with mRNA.

We don't live in the 24th century Star Trek universe. It's not a trivial thing to do and it won't even matter anyway as you won't have any alternatives that won't eventually expose you to the food.

[–] • 1 pt

Not likely and it would be too late by then anyway.

[–] • -1 pt

It is very important to remember the real danger, as I outlined here https://poal.co/s/TellPoal/627255

Focusing on the nonsense red herring that they're going to vax us through the meat is going to lose the argument and get us all killed. This is 10000% worse than the jab.