Smallpox is literally the only case I can find of an actually effective vaccine. Just about every other well known "success story" can be mostly attributed to sanitation and clean water advances. And in the case of smallpox it is clear that natural immunity via living in natural rural conditions is superior to urban drug dependency.
Maybe that's the case (probably, but I don't know) ... but, the point being is when people use absolutes w/r/t science, philosophy, etc, they look like fools.
This crazy lady loses all credibility and looks like a raving lunatic with her first sentience of the video. Either she is a fool or she is worried that she loses the argument if she doesn't deal in absolutes. Ether way, we should shun her and ignore her.
We've got to support / promote thinking people who can have rational discussions without being all or nothing on any topic.
The commie bastards on the left love to deal in absolutes. (If you haven't noticed this, I'd encourage you to look for it .. it's everywhere.) I rationally reject their thinking. But, to be rational, I must also reject absolutist on the other side of the spectrum.
Note that the Small Pox "vaccine" was administered by scarifying the skin with a bifurcated needle that held the solution. It's a very different application method (in my mind) versus the typical modern vaccine with injection deep into muscle tissue.
(post is archived)