I think it’s fair to say “we’re not responsible if it fucks you up”, but only if certain conditions are met:
-There is transparency with the data, good, bad, or indifferent. No hiding of unflattering information. Honest informed consent, in other words.
-There is no coercion EVER.
Obviously, neither of those conditions were met in the case of this jab, so it doesn’t qualify. I’m saying it could have qualified for such liability relief had those conditions been met. There’s lots of experimental drugs that people can try if they feel the risk VS reward metric is worth it. Trump was big on “right to try”, and I happen to agree with the general concept.
I’ll say we “won” when justice is restored and the criminals actually pay penalties that are equivalent to the crimes committed. And even if that happens, it’s still not exactly winning because there’s no way to replace much of what was stolen.
I agree. People should have a choice but since people weren't making the right choice out came the fucking mandates.
It's like your employer telling you participation in voluntary overtime is mandatory.
Also, one of the myriad of problems with retards like Adams is, to them, you can't just be anti-covid vaccine.. you're assumed to be entirely anti-vaccine across the board.
honk fucking honk
Also, one of the myriad of problems with retards like Adams is, to them, you can't just be anti-covid vaccine.. you're assumed to be entirely anti-vaccine across the board.
Oh yes, this sort of strawman shit drives me nuts and pisses me off to no end.. but then, the strawman argument is what they do. It's usually all they have, so they use it. And the general population is so fucking stupid that they don't see a logical fallacy any better than they know their asshole from their elbow.
I usually just say, "No, I'm against forcing people into medical experiments, which by the way, the Nuremburg codes are also against."
Obviously, that statement isn't nuanced enough to touch on all the lies told to get people to believe that the covid shot is good, IE "it's 99% safe and effective"...which is a whole other problem in of itself.
But yeah, the idea that I'm against being forced to take an experimental shot therefore I didn't get my tetanus shot, either, is ludicrous.
(post is archived)