WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

506
https://twitter.com/dchomecoming/status/1607449817529176064 https://archive.ph/AKkTn

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

and all of this was known early on, thanks to the judge that forced pfizer to release documentation now, instead of 70something years later

it was even simpler, why do a company NEED a total immunity to give you a product ?

because it is shit, literal shit, that a sheeple inject into their body

stupid sheeple

[–] 1 pt

I think that there is a misunderstanding here, but one which does not change the conclusion. This was a big study with 44,000 people which leads you to conclude it is high powered, but so few study participants caught the coof that the result is not statistically significant. You can't be very sure that the 162 control cases is truly higher than 8 vax cases by way of vax instead of chance.

We are talking risk reduction from 0.73% to 0.03% in the study. Or said differently, 99.27% of unvaxed did not catch covid.

masturbatory gesture

[–] 1 pt

Pretty crazy they were able to whittle down 44,000 people to the 8 that wouldn't get COVID.

[–] 0 pt

It's ridiculous in the first place to approve something based on the corporation's own internal study. Even if they had gotten 100% effectiveness their bias should be obvious.

[–] 0 pt

What the fuck happened to the other 43,800 people?!?!?!?!?!!?