I'm no expert on this stuff. Malone is an American physician and biochemist. His early work focused on mRNA technology, pharmaceuticals, and drug repurposing research. He's not a psychologist. If you do a search on wikipedia, they disparage him. That usually means he's over the target if wiki tries to discredit his work, yet the mRNA Vax is based on his mRNA work. Wiki is like that, anyone who is a threat to the NWO agenda gets disparaged. A similar search on Peter R. Breggin, M.D and his wife does not disparage them. I am not familiar with them, and generally have a low opinion of psychologists. The world would not have so many nuts if their work was truly effective. I found the article they wrote, and found it hard to read. They never get to the core issue and blame the lawsuit cease and desist clause for not explaining it. I would not be surprised if they used psychological tricks to talk fast and loose about Malone to disparage him. I have not seen their work other than their last article. The Defamation Lawsuit. Https://unicourt.com/case/pc-db5-malone-v-breggin-et-al-1328406 I can't download and read the lawsuit unless I join the service, and likely need to provide a charge card to pay for copies. I assume this is a pending defamation suit. I'm not a lawyer, but I assume Breggy defamed Malone in some way. Is it a valid suit? Here's Malone's Story explaining this lawsuit, a must read - https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/just-the-facts I find Malone's articles well written, complete, they flow well and as a result are easy to read. This article explains it all, includes Breggy's past articles. Stew Peters ... When he first showed up on my radar I thought he was pretty good about 2 years ago, then about 9 months later he started making wild accusations against Trump, Giuliani, Flynn and other Trump associates. No evidence, pure conjecture. Either he's working for the DS or he's a grifter after the clicks, or both. I lean towards the grifter angle. Died Suddenly has a lot of facts in it, but it was Stew Peters monetizing the moment. The film was attacked by the usual fact-checker suspects, so you know it was over the target. I believe Dr. Malone is correct in filing a defamation lawsuit against Breggy's, et al. They were fast and loose with their disparaging statements against Malone and Desmet.