she makes no decision..she has no principles...she is bought and paid for..she is told how to vote
she makes no decision..she has no principles...she is bought and paid for..she is told how to vote
she makes no decision..she has no principles...she is bought and paid for..she is told how to vote
The self-described "wise latina?"
So it was for an emergency injunction and she denied it. Doesn’t it now go before all the justices and then they vote if they’ll hear the full arguments next time they’re in session?
Wasn't she the one shrieking all the bullshit in the OSHA mandate case?
Not sure there.
(post is archived)