WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

836

Targeted killing or just lethally bad quality control? And yet those who are supposed to protect us call for moar children to be vexxed.

Targeted killing or just lethally bad quality control? And yet those who are supposed to protect us call for moar children to be vexxed.

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 6 pts

It’s an advocacy model.

Not all the shots are killshots. Probably only 15-20% are.

That way you achieve your reduction gradually and 80% of recipients will advocate the shot as safe and harmless.

[–] 0 pt

It would be smart to get a population used to being shot then roll out the killer shots on mass

[–] 2 pts

COVID wasn't killing anyone, so they had to use the vac to kill people so they could blame it on COVID and cause fear in the stupid so they would go out and get jabbed.

The effect would be too substantial to be viable.

Surprisingly poisoning people in mass is not as simple as it might seem. A dose powerful enough to ensure 100% death would have a noticeable and immediate effect on 50% of the population. Tipping their hand.

Supposedly the gene manipulation will have a more gradual effect, but clearly, they need you to keep taking it, so it’s effects are diminishing, and not as powerful as The Science ™ would have you believe.

My thought is that it’s two-pronged. Gene therapy for the obedient masses that perpetually weakens their immunity, with a hot shot mixed in to speed it up just below the threshold of public awareness.