The first sentence doesn’t make sense?
It’s either the government funding them for their desired results, Pharma or whoever else is providing funding. If you publish independently then the other departments could lose funding at the institutions in retaliation.
How many climate change studies have you seen in the msm that disprove “man made climate” change. I’ve seen one by NASA who predicted the earth would “brown” and would be a disaster, when the data was compiled the earth had “green’d” 14% which was now a disaster because you can only green so much.
What? Most plants die every year and new ones grow in their place or they get bigger all which require carbon. By “greening” you’ve actually created natural carbon capture that puts it back into the ground.
Not that carbon is bad to begin with, the more carbon the the faster plants, trees and crops grow.
I stand by my first sentence. It’s an evil jewy system that is at work in academia that forces scientist to lie or alter their results. True science would never do that. Scientists who publish their honest results, do not get funding and do not survive so called (((peer))) review.
Yeah, that’s why I said they’re guilty, money over lives is a crime against humanity. Hiding data and letting people die is bad no matter how evil or jewy the system is. Stand up and try to save people otherwise you’re an accomplice.
It didn’t work at Nuremberg and it won’t work if trials happen again. Everyone remaining silent or outright lying for money are all guilty.
(post is archived)