The other researchers who refuse to publish because of possible funding cuts and the other doctors he’s talking to seeing the same thing should all be hung.
Once that study was completed and they decided not to publish to confirm the other study every heart event is on them, the same as the doctors who are remaining quiet about younger and younger heart patients.
The people who published are exempt, they did what was right.
That’s not how scientific funding works. It’s awful and has nothing to do with science. But scientists put up with this shit instead of doing science.
The first sentence doesn’t make sense?
It’s either the government funding them for their desired results, Pharma or whoever else is providing funding. If you publish independently then the other departments could lose funding at the institutions in retaliation.
How many climate change studies have you seen in the msm that disprove “man made climate” change. I’ve seen one by NASA who predicted the earth would “brown” and would be a disaster, when the data was compiled the earth had “green’d” 14% which was now a disaster because you can only green so much.
What? Most plants die every year and new ones grow in their place or they get bigger all which require carbon. By “greening” you’ve actually created natural carbon capture that puts it back into the ground.
Not that carbon is bad to begin with, the more carbon the the faster plants, trees and crops grow.
I stand by my first sentence. It’s an evil jewy system that is at work in academia that forces scientist to lie or alter their results. True science would never do that. Scientists who publish their honest results, do not get funding and do not survive so called (((peer))) review.
That’s not how scientific funding works.
Yet this is exactly how it works.
It’s awful and has nothing to do with science.
True.
But scientists put up with this shit instead of doing science.
Can you really call them scientists without redefining the word "scientist"?
(post is archived)