WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

The use of the term “anti-vaxxer” has been a propaganda buzzword for a long time.

A vast number of folks even in the spheres I watch, are always quick to point out that they aren’t “anti-vaxxers.” I find it increasingly hilarious and pathetic that they offer that sort of idiotic, limp-wristed disclaimer, as if somehow being “anti-vaccine” makes you “anti-science.”

This has been a concerted effort for decades to prime the pump of incredulity against anyone who refuses to allow himself of his loved ones to partake of voodoo pharmaceuticals with dubious scientific and statistical claims, and zero financial and legal responsibility for the manufacturers.

It wasn’t a coincidence, because this sort of idiocy was the endgame - locking out the noncompliant and the independent thinker.

This current Covid “vaccine” they are pushing could be a mix of harmless vitamins that have positive effects or even placebos with zero negative ones. It doesn’t matter. What matters is the right to refuse, not to seek exemption or permission to refuse, but to outright refuse on the grounds that I don’t want it, and have that be the end of it.

The “vaxxer” isn’t the person who is willing to be “vaccinated,” those would be “vaxees.” The “vaxxer” is the person who advocates for the “vaccination” of others.

So with that said, if you aren’t an “anti-vaxxer” by this point, you aren’t opposing this pseudo-scientific, white coat tyranny, and you’re as much to blame as the “vaxxers” themselves.

The use of the term “anti-vaxxer” has been a propaganda buzzword for a long time. A vast number of folks even in the spheres I watch, are always quick to point out that they aren’t “anti-vaxxers.” I find it increasingly hilarious and pathetic that they offer that sort of idiotic, limp-wristed disclaimer, as if somehow being “anti-vaccine” makes you “anti-science.” This has been a concerted effort for decades to prime the pump of incredulity against anyone who refuses to allow himself of his loved ones to partake of voodoo pharmaceuticals with dubious scientific and statistical claims, and zero financial and legal responsibility for the manufacturers. It wasn’t a coincidence, because this sort of idiocy was the endgame - locking out the noncompliant and the independent thinker. This current Covid “vaccine” they are pushing could be a mix of harmless vitamins that have positive effects or even placebos with zero negative ones. It doesn’t matter. What matters is the right to refuse, not to seek exemption or permission to refuse, but to outright refuse on the grounds that I don’t want it, and have that be the end of it. The “vaxxer” isn’t the person who is willing to be “vaccinated,” those would be “vaxees.” The “vaxxer” is the person who advocates for the “vaccination” of others. So with that said, if you aren’t an “anti-vaxxer” by this point, you aren’t opposing this pseudo-scientific, white coat tyranny, and you’re as much to blame as the “vaxxers” themselves.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

There is no covid vaccine, there is a really unsuccessful gene therapy option being branded as a vaccine.

You might say this gene therapy self identifies as a vaccine.

How can I be anti vax when there is no vax, available in the first world, the india and china vaccines for covid which are made using a similar method as flu vax are about 30-45% effective which is about as good as flu vaccines, not that anybody should need them, WE HAVE A CHEAP AND NIGH UBIQUITOUS CURE WITH DECADES OF DATA BEHINDS ITS USE IN HUMANS.

Stop letting lugenpresse reverse psychology you into a rhetorical clothesline.