The use of the term “anti-vaxxer” has been a propaganda buzzword for a long time. A vast number of folks even in the spheres I watch, are always quick to point out that they aren’t “anti-vaxxers.” I find it increasingly hilarious and pathetic that they offer that sort of idiotic, limp-wristed disclaimer, as if somehow being “anti-vaccine” makes you “anti-science.” This has been a concerted effort for decades to prime the pump of incredulity against anyone who refuses to allow himself of his loved ones to partake of voodoo pharmaceuticals with dubious scientific and statistical claims, and zero financial and legal responsibility for the manufacturers. It wasn’t a coincidence, because this sort of idiocy was the endgame - locking out the noncompliant and the independent thinker. This current Covid “vaccine” they are pushing could be a mix of harmless vitamins that have positive effects or even placebos with zero negative ones. It doesn’t matter. What matters is the right to refuse, not to seek exemption or permission to refuse, but to outright refuse on the grounds that I don’t want it, and have that be the end of it. The “vaxxer” isn’t the person who is willing to be “vaccinated,” those would be “vaxees.” The “vaxxer” is the person who advocates for the “vaccination” of others. So with that said, if you aren’t an “anti-vaxxer” by this point, you aren’t opposing this pseudo-scientific, white coat tyranny, and you’re as much to blame as the “vaxxers” themselves.