Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

396

(post is archived)

[–] • 4 pts

Pfizer explains, on page 6, that “Due to the large numbers of spontaneous adverse event reports received for the product, [Pfizer] has prioritised the processing of serious cases…”

That's jew-speak for, "there were so many cases that we started ignoring many of them."

[–] • 1 pt

"Serious" meaning only reports of death because the dead can't report and most doctors are kiked and won't report vax caused deaths.

[–] • 1 pt

The scary part is that this data wasn't already compiled for FDA approval. Seriously WTF?

[–] • 1 pt

That's because they didn't look at it. I'd be surprised if there is more than a few hundred pages of real data.

[–] • 1 pt

Wholly irresponsible.

[–] • 1 pt

There's no way anyone could read that much paper in that short of a time. I used to be a voracious reader, going through a book a day, but even at a 300 page novel that's only about 110k pages - in a year. And that was just literature, nothing that required scientific analysis.

[–] • 1 pt

Which group in the FDA read reviewed and approved 1000 pages per day..almost a year at that rate....?