WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.3K

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

There's an image from the report that outlines what the deaths were in each group.

The data from the report is sloppy record keeping, but I found this statement (from the author of the column) to be particularly interesting:

Further, nine vaccine recipients had died from cardiovascular events such as heart attacks or strokes, compared to six placebo recipients who died of those causes. The imbalance was small but notable, considering that regulators worldwide had found that the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines were linked to heart inflammation in young men.

Ideally, if there's nothing wrong with what you're testing, deaths would be roughly equal in both categories. 6 and 9 out of 44,000 total participants is somewhat statistically insignificant, but it (to me) would indicate that it's something to be looked at later. If you add the known data of heart problems as evidenced by countries stopping the injections for younger people, this should have been a smoking gun that something was amiss and needed further investigation. They (the FDA) obviously didn't want to do that and went ahead and approved the stuff, probably just rubber stamping whatever came across their desk.

[–] 1 pt

Agreed. And my point is how did anyone die of heart attack or stroke from the placebo group. Odd to say the least.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

People die of that kind of thing all the time. That it happened isn't really suspicious - especially in the USA where ~600,000 people die of heart related issues every year - that they tried to fudge the numbers tells all.

[–] 1 pt

That was my first thought but they are supposed to screen participants extensively. Anyone with ANY known conditions would be removed. With that said, yes, I agree, it tells all.