Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

https://newzworldtoday.com/utah-to-pilot-digital-drivers-license-in-2022-could-technology-include-social-credit-scoring/ And here’s an official link that doesn’t get too deep into specifics on what data it might collect: https://publicsafety.utah.gov/2021/04/20/new-mobile-driver-license-to-offer-utahns-enhanced-privacy/

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (23).
[–] • 0 pt

Put it this way. Its irrelevant if it's a religious mandate, as they have been telling us and seeking consent for at least several hundreds years. If you want to claim it's not a religious mandate, fine. But whatever is going on, all evidence indicates there is some form of ethos and mandated consent agreement, be it religious or otherwise.

[–] • 0 pt

all evidence indicates the is some form of ethos and mandated consent agreement

Big claim without backing evidence. "All evidence" is very broad but you just want to use a few cherry picked events where someone like Klaus Schwab has said one of these phrases as your backing evidence. Ego can better explain their explain their use of these phrases- they just want to rub it in your face because you can't do shit to stop them. Don't try to imbue them with some sort of ethos when they have none.

[–] • 0 pt

I encourage you to read more. All evidence isn't some imagining on my part. Your declaration on this immediately convinces me you know much less than you claim.

There is a lengthy historical record of them telling and showing us. Your comments to it only means your conclusion is biased accordingly.

Good luck.

[–] • 0 pt

I know much on this topic. Perhaps I know something you don't and that's why I say otherwise. Anyway, there's no point in further debating this as neither of us will change opinions, so yeah, it is what it is.