I encourage you to read more. All evidence isn't some imagining on my part. Your declaration on this immediately convinces me you know much less than you claim.
There is a lengthy historical record of them telling and showing us. Your comments to it only means your conclusion is biased accordingly.
Good luck.
I know much on this topic. Perhaps I know something you don't and that's why I say otherwise. Anyway, there's no point in further debating this as neither of us will change opinions, so yeah, it is what it is.
You just declared ignorance of historical record. Now you claim your ignorance means you know more and therefore I'm wrong and ignorant.
You are a comedian. Even if you don't know it.
Good luck.
And this reply is why it's not worth wasting time on you. Dunning-Kruger has you good.
(post is archived)