By october 15th the cancer causing side effect increase will be more emerging in statistics
No it won't. This is definitely among the most retarded talking points even cooked up about the mRNA vaccines.
Hint: cancer is from mutated DNA. There is literally not pathway for an mRNA vaccine to cause cancer.
There are other pervasive pseudoscience arguments being made about the mRNA vaccines and causing cancer. Such as "the mRNA vaccines suppress certain proteins which prevented certain types of cancer." That one was false because it was basing it off of a study from 2018 when these mRNA vaccines didn't exist for this:
https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-afs:Content:9994785135
Viruses are known to cause cancer. Reverse-transcribing DNA with RNA through reverse-Transciptase is known to happen. Not saying, that THIS PARTICULAR mRNA shot does the same.
Furthermore, the clot-shot is supposed to damage some people's immune system, which in turn makes them more prone to cancer. Identifying and disposing of cancer cells is one of its functions, after all.
Correct (Immuno-oncology) : T-Cells keeping back many forms of cancer, especially anal cancer, and cervical cancer. And the mRNA jabbed are missing 40% of the types of T-Cells that hunt down aberrant DNA cells. I mention it in another more detailed post and erred in this thread by not being pedantic on the topic of :
Immuno-oncology
I am more detailed in my cancer prediction in :
https://poal.co/s/News/437982/283c8303-5b92-4271-a902-a67e785c156a
Are you uneducated in science?
Clearly not. Since I do science and statistics for a living. You, on the other hand, are quite full of disinformation, you're an idiot, and you're definitely full of shit.
Notice how your lengthy reply, which clearly indicates you have mental problems (getting some schizophrenia vibes from you), contains not a shred of real science in it at all? Just a mish-mash of pseudoscience.
This guy nil keeps pushing things that seem like it could be right to the uneducated but totally wrong to a subject matter expert.
Case in point his breakdown of the Brandenburg test in another thread which was purposefully deceitful in telling Poalers that threatening imminent harm is free speech as long as the timeframe is over 365 days. That's getting you arrested.
Case in point his breakdown of the Brandenburg test in another thread which was purposefully deceitful in telling Poalers that threatening imminent harm is free speech as long as the timeframe is over 365 days. That's getting you arrested.
Unsure about the 365 days thing but there is a "immediacy" means test to criminally threats of violence.
Unprotected violence speech must have the following criteria:
Be intended to provoke imminent lawless action; and
Be likely to cause such action.
So like you said, he seems rather full of shit.
No that's simply wrong.
Cancer originates in the mitochondria, not the nucleus. DNA damage is downstream of the originating metabolic damage resulting in free radicals (Warburg Effect), and many cancers don't involve any DNA damage whatsoever. There is very clear clinical proof of this in that a cancer cell nucleus can be transplanted into non-cancerous cytoplasm and the cell will remain non-cancerous. The reverse is not true.
Many things that mess with metabolic processes can cause cancer, including most modern foods available today. It is not a stretch at all to think an MRNA vaccine can cause cancer since the spike proteins bind to ACE2 receptors that directly interface with the mitochondria and cause mitochondrial damage.
This is why you shouldn't simply defer any responsibility for critical thinking to "fact checkers".
did you just link to a fact checking article seriously? pmsl
Did you just seriously miss the entire point and think this is about a fact checking article instead of the article pointing out the origin of this "cancer" talking point by linking the original 2018 research?
You do know you can skip the entire fact checking article, read the research the 'cancer' bullshit Facebook point was about, and see the date on that research article is clearly 2018.
Here's how it breaks down:
Retards: "SEEE! SEEE! THE RESEARCH SHOWS THESE COVID19 MRNA VACCINES CAUSE CANCER!!!!!"
Me: "You dumb retards. The research being cited is from 2018, a full 2 years and some change before the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines were even used in human trials. It is literally impossible for this research to support your point because the fucking vaccines didn't even exist. You fucking retards."
Then retards like you respond, "ZOOOOMG!!! YOU USED A FACT CHECKING NEWS SITE TO PROVE IT WRONG!" As if you've never even heard of an ad hominem attack or even contemplated reading what you actually responded to. Like a proper retard.
Ap would never lie.
If you think this is about AP lying or not, you didn't understand my point and you didn't understand what AP was actually debunking.
Hint: AP linked to the study being used to blame the mRNA vaccines for the cancers and the study is from 2018, 2 years before these vaccines were even being used. With two brain cells, you can figure it out.
OP:
They just announced that they are requiring all remote and on site employees to take the clot shot by Oct 15.
Also.... early numbers are already coming in for cancer increasing year-over-year
(post is archived)