I think some of you guys get lost in the weeds on this subject.
Vaccines don’t really prevent infection completely, they prevent disease— a clinical case of a viral illness, typically with symptoms and higher rates of transmissability.
Even when a vax “works”, a virus can still get in to your airways or G.I. tract and start reproducing in a few cells —infection.
But with strong immunity, the body will quickly respond by producing antibodies and neutralizing the virus before you notice symptoms or the viral load reaches “contagious” quantities. When viral levels are very low, the chance of spreading the virus is extremely small. As viruses begin to replicate, the probability of infecting someone else increases.
Dont think of viral infection as a binary yes/no infected/not infected event. Think of it as a continuous probability curve of low to high potential to become symptomatic or spread the virus.
The vaccine is producing a high immunity for one specific protein, the spike protein on the original sars cov 2 strain, ( for those that don’t die from it). Basically everyone who had the vax has an identical antibody.
Not so for people infected with various wild sars cov 2 strains. They will have immunity to different proteins in the virus, and to slightly different strains of virus— a better, less narrow immunity. This is a tougher environment for the virus to evolve in. The virus has to acquire many mutations to evade many types of antibodies.
But now that several billion people have an identical antibody to a single protein, this will push the evolution of the virus to out maneuvre that common antibody everybody has by changing just the spike protein. The strains that do this will replace all other strains and will become enormously successful in everyone who was vaccinated.
If they were going to vaccinate anyone— which I don’t think they should have given the obviously shit safety record of this turd vax— it should have only been the most vulnerable people. This would be a disaster, even if the vax were safe. Which it aint.
https://www.amazon.com/ivermectin-horses/s?k=ivermectin+for+horses
Has the virus been isolated?
Vaccines don’t really prevent infection completely, they prevent disease— a clinical case of a viral illness
Good point, thanks.
Most vaccines up until now have been of the innoculating kind which prevent infection. But now shills and MSM are trying to make you forget that, and say that vaccines have always been about reducing the symptoms of the illness.
reducing the symptoms of the illness
I mean. They aren't wrong. Total and complete immunity from a pathogen is a reduction in symptoms. ... :) Just smile. It helps.
e; This is not to say these 3 mRNA bio-weapon shots cause either of the outcomes talked about. The outcome they cause is death by way of debilitation.
ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah Be more fucking obvious abigail.
Vaccines give immunity you stupid cunt. With immunity you can't be an incidental carrier as your body will near immediately kill any possibility of the virus sustaining itself on your person.
Your entire post is literal pilpul coupled with false pedantry. It's so gay it mimics tel aviv.
To who is jewish enough to have me blocked but still have the chutzpah to troll me:
literal pilpul and false pedantry.
Literal pilpul means that my comment was an actual analysis of the talmud, right? And if pedantry is an ostentatious, overly academic show of learning, my comment was not that, then: not truly pedantry. Pedantry would be if I was throwing around words like pilpul and pedantry with out understanding them in order to seem more intelligent than you. I don’t need to worry about such things happily.
Immunity has several meanings related to various levels of insusceptibility—absolute or otherwise— from harm or obligation in various contexts. But in this case it is the state of being highly resistant to a disease because of the formation of antibodies or of immune cells to a pathogen. It does not imply a total imperviousness to infection of a virus. Cells need to signal the immune system and the immune system needs time to react. This is not instantaneous.
With immunity you can't be an incidental carrier
You can be. This can be expressed as a probability function of the number of virions in your body and is not zero if the virus goes up your nose. Immunity is resistance due to antibodies and other immune cells and it is not absolute.
as your body will near immediately kill any possibility of the virus sustaining itself on your person.
near immediately? So not instantaneous?
Infection seems binary but immunologically it isn’t.
You should listen to me sweetie. I know more than you.
(post is archived)